[DRMAA-WG] MonitoringSession

[Peter Tröger]

Hi,

I can agree to the new "threadsPerCore" attribute, but would prefer to have "1" as default value. From our understanding of a core, each one can always execute at least one thread. It would also allow to compute an estimation of the number of parallel threads, without looking on the specific numbers.

Best,
Peter.


Am 08.11.2010 um 10:55 schrieb Daniel Gruber:

> Hi, 
> 
> in the MonitorinSession we have on machine level machineSockets and coresPerSocket. 
> To be consequent we should also add threadsPerCore. At least OGE/SGE does 
> support this. I added it into our spreadsheet. 
> If this is not supported by a DRM/OS it could return 0 as value for unknown.
> 
> 0 for coresPerSocket and machineSockets is not allowed since we should 
> define coresPerSocket*machineSockets=="processors" in case a DRM or OS 
> does not support this kind of architectural information. I suggest to leave
> it open for the DRMAA implementation if it maps the "processors" information
> to coresPerSocket or machineSockets in case of missing architectural 
> details.
> 
> If there is no objection I'll take this as accepted. 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Daniel
> --
>  drmaa-wg mailing list
>  drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg