[DRMAA-WG] MonitoringSession

[Andre Merzky]

+1



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Daniel Gruber
<daniel.x.gruber at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the MonitorinSession we have on machine level machineSockets and coresPerSocket.
> To be consequent we should also add threadsPerCore. At least OGE/SGE does
> support this. I added it into our spreadsheet.
> If this is not supported by a DRM/OS it could return 0 as value for unknown.
>
> 0 for coresPerSocket and machineSockets is not allowed since we should
> define coresPerSocket*machineSockets=="processors" in case a DRM or OS
> does not support this kind of architectural information. I suggest to leave
> it open for the DRMAA implementation if it maps the "processors" information
> to coresPerSocket or machineSockets in case of missing architectural
> details.
>
> If there is no objection I'll take this as accepted.
>
> Cheers
>
> Daniel
> --
>  drmaa-wg mailing list
>  drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>



-- 
Nothing is ever easy...