[DRMAA-WG] MonitoringSession

[Daniel Gruber]

Ok. For simplicity we take 1 as default value with the 
drawback that we loose information if the SMT value 
is available (and correct) or not. 

Regards, 

Daniel

On 11/08/10 15:14, Peter Tröger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I can agree to the new "threadsPerCore" attribute, but would prefer to have "1" as default value. From our understanding of a core, each one can always execute at least one thread. It would also allow to compute an estimation of the number of parallel threads, without looking on the specific numbers.
> 
> Best,
> Peter.
> 
> 
> Am 08.11.2010 um 10:55 schrieb Daniel Gruber:
> 
>> Hi, 
>>
>> in the MonitorinSession we have on machine level machineSockets and coresPerSocket. 
>> To be consequent we should also add threadsPerCore. At least OGE/SGE does 
>> support this. I added it into our spreadsheet. 
>> If this is not supported by a DRM/OS it could return 0 as value for unknown.
>>
>> 0 for coresPerSocket and machineSockets is not allowed since we should 
>> define coresPerSocket*machineSockets=="processors" in case a DRM or OS 
>> does not support this kind of architectural information. I suggest to leave
>> it open for the DRMAA implementation if it maps the "processors" information
>> to coresPerSocket or machineSockets in case of missing architectural 
>> details.
>>
>> If there is no objection I'll take this as accepted. 
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Daniel
>> --
>>  drmaa-wg mailing list
>>  drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>