[dfdl-wg] Conference Call Today - notes

[Martin Westhead]

Myers, James D wrote:
> Sorry for the late FYI on this:
> 
> If we have a meeting in Toronto (anywhere outside the US), PNNL staff
> will need 45-60 days to get clearance for the foreign travel. That would
> mean making decisions about dates and specific location as soon as
> possible for us to be involved. (I would hope to have at least one of us
> and probably two of us there.)

I would be keen to attend this but it doesn't look like I'll be able to 
make it in person. If/when it goes ahead can we arrange for 
teleconference facilities so I can call in?

Thanks,

Martin















>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-dfdl-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-dfdl-wg at ggf.org] On 
>>Behalf Of mike.beckerle at ascentialsoftware.com
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 12:45 PM
>>To: dfdl-wg at gridforum.org
>>Subject: [dfdl-wg] Conference Call Today - notes
>>
>>
>>
>>DFDL-WG Conference call 2005-02-16
>>
>>Attendees: Suman Kalia, Steve Hanson, Susan Malaika - IBM,  
>>Tara Talbot - PNNL, Mike Beckerle - Ascential Software
>>
>>IBM offered to host a F2F meeting in mid to late April, or 
>>early May at their Toronto facility. Seems like a good time 
>>frame. Gives Ascential folks time time to get prototype "in 
>>play", and leaves time before the June GGF
>>(Chicago) to get some things written up.
>>
>>MikeB and Suman to schedule time to work on combined model 
>>and list of representation properties: week of Feb 28th. 
>>
>>Ascential prototype: hoping to have simplest examples working 
>>by end of this week. (No promises). Things like 2 binary 
>>integers. MikeB to post current XSD for dfdl properties and a 
>>few of our test files for the prototype. 
>>
>>Susan asked about whether implementations of things like BFD 
>>are available. Tara to investigate whether BFD is publicly 
>>available now.
>>
>>We discussed when to start recruiting Oracle, Microsoft, and 
>>other participants, since we will need them. We agreed that 
>>our hope would be the June GGF though it really depends on 
>>having an initial document representing some sort of 
>>converged consensus of the current team on current directions.
>>
>>
>>Mike Beckerle
>>Ascential
>>
>>
> 
> 
>