DOC - Decentralized Onion Communication

jim bell jdb10987 at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 9 16:27:36 PST 2022



Aaaaaaa
 
  On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 3:20 PM, Stefan Claas<spam.trap.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 10:09 PM zeynepaydogan
> <zeynepaydogan at protonmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Stefan, do you really recommend the Tor network here?  Google users don't expect privacy, but the Tor network is deceiating people who expect "privacy".The ex Tor developer here might say that the US government is funding the Tor.Don't use smartphone but use Tor?
> > LOL
>
> Hi Zeynep,
>
> if you are familiar how to edit a torrc, you can then define in their
> trustworthy nodes
> from privacy folks and privacy organizations. Or if you know how to run your own
> VPS server you can then use your own one as a trustworthy node.
>
> Nym is not ready yet for production, as an alternative and gives you
> also not more
> privacy by design, even if it is a Mixnet and will most like cost you
> money then (crypto
> currency) once in production.
>
> Regarding smartphones, at least you can run my proposal on your
> smartphone ... ;-)__________________

>And with Tor you can run then also professional Mixnet clients, Like YAMN
or Mixmaster and then send those messages to the Bitmessage Network.

>How cool is that?



Jim Bell's comment:
Do you recall my suggestion from about 2 years ago that a new anonymity network be built, akin to TOR, but hosted by 1000+ people out of their homes and small businesses?  I mentioned using Raspberry Pi.  
The main desirable thing is that unlimited-data Internet be available, which even then was true for 940 Mb/sec $65 month service.  (CenturyLink service).  I believe they are now  offering 100 Mbits/sec for $30/month, which should be plenty for an anonymzation network.
I suggested that all nodes be able to act as output nodes, and that to facilitate this, all outputs be subject to mild (or better?) encryption, to ensure than plaintext never appears on any output node.  (To avoid inadvertently providing 'probable cause' to justify a search warrant.)
Is somebody ready to talk about this?

  
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 4517 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20220110/79a6e66c/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list