Key witness in Assange case admits to lies in indictment - Stundin

[David Barrett]

On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 5:56 PM Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 8:48 PM David Barrett <dbarrett at expensify.com> wrote:
>
>> If so, can you help me understand why you support Sweden prosecuting an
>> ordinary person, but you do not support them prosecuting Assange?
>>
>
> I formed an opinion on that, now.  It's not the one you say I have.
>

Ok just to confirm, does that mean you *do* support Sweden prosecuting
Assange for sexual assault, irrespective of whatever happens with the US?
(I'm sorry, the double negative was confusing me.)

[Meditation for criminal cases] is actually available, just not in all the
> legal systems.
>

To my knowledge, no nation uses meditation as you describe for criminal
trials (eg, murder).  Are you saying that some do?  Can you point me to
which you are modeling your recommendation on so I can learn more?

This is again a situation where [out current system] is usually better than
> [nothing], but [nothing] is better in cases of very frivolous or
> mis-ordered accusations.
>

Ok!  This helps me understand your position!  You argree that our justice
system is "usually" better than nothing, right?  This is important so I
just really want to double confirm before I build on this.

Thanks!

David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 5135 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20210705/2c80bd94/attachment.txt>