On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 5:56 PM Karl <[1]gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:

   On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 8:48 PM David Barrett <[2]dbarrett@expensify.com>
   wrote:

   If so, can you help me understand why you support Sweden prosecuting an
   ordinary person, but you do not support them prosecuting Assange?

   I formed an opinion on that, now.  It's not the one you say I have.

   Ok just to confirm, does that mean you *do* support Sweden prosecuting
   Assange for sexual assault, irrespective of whatever happens with the
   US?  (I'm sorry, the double negative was confusing me.)

   [Meditation for criminal cases] is actually available, just not in all
   the legal systems.

   To my knowledge, no nation uses meditation as you describe for criminal
   trials (eg, murder).  Are you saying that some do?  Can you point me to
   which you are modeling your recommendation on so I can learn more?

   This is again a situation where [out current system] is usually better
   than [nothing], but [nothing] is better in cases of very frivolous or
   mis-ordered accusations.

   Ok!  This helps me understand your position!  You argree that our
   justice system is "usually" better than nothing, right?  This is
   important so I just really want to double confirm before I build on
   this.
   Thanks!
   David

References

   1. mailto:gmkarl@gmail.com
   2. mailto:dbarrett@expensify.com