Scientists Accidentally Recreate Big Bang Detonation in the Lab

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:49:20PM -0600, \0xDynamite wrote:
> > Lol. I don't consider math, computer science, or astronomy subjects
> > susceptible to
> > brainwashing. It's not dogma, the shit advances & changes iteratively, over
> > time, with
> > the work of researchers & the err “scientific mafia” ;)
> 
> Math and comp sci are TIGHT, but do not lump astronomy into those
> fields.  Can you explain transparency of the lens?   ANSWER:  NO YOU
> CANNOT.
> 
> Astronomy pretty much depended on the lens and it encodes a deep
> ontology with respect to this universe and GOD lerself (my substitute
> for the omnigendered pronoun of GOD).
> 
> Trust me, no one in science has ever explained it.  Why does it have a
> preferred axiis when your eyes look at it?  That's just one problem
> with treating it all as perfect as digital logic and math.
> 
> So, once you get out of pure math and digital logic, you have entered
> the realm of MODELS.  To be sure though, all our math relies on the
> unprovable premises which co-evolved with consciousness itself (like
> A=A) otherwise there would be an endless set of maths.

Actually, there are endless sets of maths.

Maths is quite broad orly ... bends the mind just exploring little
corners of it all, often ending in "sheesh, my achey breaky brain
needs a coffee".

;)