Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

[xorcist at sigaint.org]

> 	Besides since you are an anti-rationalist, why would you care
> 	about any 'refutation'.

I'm not anti-rationalist, any more than I am anti-wrench. It's a tool. And
when it is a useful too, I'm more than willing to use it.

But not all problems are mere nuts and bolts.


>> lulz. You're ridiculous, which is why I enjoy saying ridiculous
>> things in return, sweet tits.
>
>
> 	And that sums it up. In reality, what you say to me is the very
> 	exact garbage you put in all your posts. You type the mental
> 	vomits that your brain creates. Like your proposal for a
> 	'community' run cyber police state "little sister". Sick - but
> 	rather useful as a clue to what you really are.

Yes, it does: a realist. I don't like the idea of surveillance in general.
Just as I don't like the idea of nukes, in general. But I'm a realist.
Nukes, unfortunately, do in fact exist. In this, nation-states found the
only workable strategy to be a strategy of mutual deterrence; so I find
that this same strategy may be the only one workable with regards to a
police state and surveillance.

What's sick, to my way of thinking, is to KNOW that the state has
surveillance abilities, and to oppose citizenry from making an equally
capable system to keep the state/police in check. That would be like
opposing the Soviet's from pursuing nukes when they knew America had them.
It's, frankly, nonsensical.

If I could, somehow, make all surveillance technology either cease to
exist, or in some way moot, I'd happily do so. As I would for nukes.

But that isn't reality.

I don't engage much with ideology, and the 'should be' nature of people's
opinions. I understand that the sunset might well be prettier if there
were some greens, or silvers thrown in. Maybe things "should be" that way,
according to your aethstetic, and I would likely agree so long as we're
talking deep greens, and not some garish color. I might like two moons, as
well.

But it is irrelevant, because are not not that way, and anything you might
do to the atmosphere to make some nice shades of green show up,  would
most surely make a worse mess of things than we already have.

What is. Not what is not. 'Rational' 'principled' 'idealistic' thinkers
tend to have difficulty in this. I get it. I really do. I once had
difficulty with it as well.

But then one day I realized its far better to appreciate the sunset, and
do what you can to keep the park you're enjoying it in cleanly, than to
sit around pissing and moaning about the garbage and how the sunset
doesn't even have the appropriate colors.