Quantum entangled-photon Chinese satellite.

[Cari Machet]

fish see surface

but yes our perception but also the n dimension

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuvK-od647c

Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance

Published on Jan 12, 2015

Does quantum entanglement make faster-than-light communication possible?
What is NOT random? http://bit.ly/NOTrandoVe
First, I know this video is not easy to understand. Thank you for taking
the time to attempt to understand it. I've been working on this for over
six months over which time my understanding has improved. Quantum
entanglement and spooky action at a distance are still debated by
professors of quantum physics (I know because I discussed this topic with
two of them).

Does hidden information (called hidden variables by physicists) exist? If
it does, the experiment violating Bell inequalities indicates that hidden
variables must update faster than light - they would be considered
'non-local'. On the other hand if you don't consider the spins before you
make the measurement then you could simply say hidden variables don't exist
and whenever you measure spins in the same direction you always get
opposite results, which makes sense since angular momentum must be
conserved in the universe.

Everyone agrees that quantum entanglement does not allow information to be
transmitted faster that light. There is no action either detector operator
could take to signal the other one - regardless of the choice of
measurement direction, the measured spins are random with 50/50 probability
of up/down.

Special thanks to:
Prof. Stephen Bartlett, University of Sydney: http://bit.ly/1xSosoJ
Prof. John Preskill, Caltech: http://bit.ly/1y8mJut

Looking Glass Universe: http://bit.ly/17zZH7l
Physics Girl: http://bit.ly/PhysGirl
MinutePhysics: http://bit.ly/MinPhys
Community Channel: http://bit.ly/CommChannel
Nigel, Helen, Luke, and Simon for comments on earlier drafts of this video.

Filmed in part by Scott Lewis: http://google.com/+scottlewis

Music by Amarante "One Last Time": http://bit.ly/VeAmarante



++++++++++++++++


n dimension stuff


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI9uuHuc1iU&list=PL865E510770E164CB




On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Sci Fith <scfith at riseup.net> wrote:

> I believe our understanding of info transfer needs to change. The data is
> not traveling anywhere because it appears to exist simultaneously here &
> there and when one changes the other does without delay. There has to be
> another dimension of energy / ether we need to discover that would make
> this make sense. Like looking into a fish pond but the fish don't see
> surface, only your hand dipping in water as a miraculous occurrence.
>
> jamescampbell.us
> 7032039877
>
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 5:58 PM, jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> *From:* juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:49:12 +0000 (UTC)
> jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> Apparently, that is true.   The tantalizing thing is that SOMETHING
> >> APPEARS   (information, of some nature) to be transferred between one
> >> particle and another, distant one, and yet there seems to be no way
> >> to use that transfer to actually transmit useful FTL
>
>  >  Which sounds rather absurd no?
>
> Certainly that sounds absurd!   It IS absurd!  Which explains a lot of the
> fascination
> has for entangled photons and related phenomena.  Einstein never liked the
> quantum-mechanics idea, famously declaring "God does not play dice with the
> universe".     Unfortunately for Einstein, dice are actually played.
>
> In fact, Einstein's EPR Paradox (Einstein, Podolski, Rosen) was invented by
> Einstein himself in an attempt to prove that quantum mechanics could not
> be a complete statement of the problem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> EPR_paradox
>
> This principle said that IF quantum mechanics
> were a complete statement of the problem, then something seemingly
> impossible [fill in the blank with FTL information travel] would occur.
> Einstein was
> quite convinced that nothing (including no information) could travel
> faster than
> 'c'.  Amazingly, it appears that nature ("God", for the religious among
> you) has acted
> simultaneously to protect the quantum mechanics theory, but ALSO to
> protect
> Einstein's belief that nothing could travel faster than 'c'.   If anybody
> should discover
> a method to use entangled photons to effectively transmit data FTL (and
> thus,
> presumably at infinite speed) that person would surely deserve a Nobel
> Prize in
> Physics.
>
>
>  >Either this is ordinary EM
>  > phenomena that propagate at the so called speed of light, or
>  > it is something else which could propagate at 'faster than
>  > light' speed.
>
> It's at least 10,000 times 'c' the speed of light in a vacuum, according to
> experiments involving fiber optics.  It might be essentially infinite.
>
>   >  If 'something' is moving at faster than light speed, then some
>   > information must be being transmitted. If no information is
> >    being transmitted, then by definition, there's no way to measure
>   >  speed and the claim makes no sense.
>
> Well, that's the problem.  Knowing that SOMETHING is being transmitted,
> and actually
> USING that method to transmit useful information, are (quite strangely)
> two different
> things.  That, also is the amazing implications of entangled photons.
>
>                Jim Bell
>
>


-- 
Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet at gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Berlin +49 152 11779219
Reykjavik +354 894 8650
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>

7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187

Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
permission is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 15841 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160805/aac2fa75/attachment-0002.txt>