Quantum entangled-photon Chinese satellite.

[Sci Fith]

I believe our understanding of info transfer needs to change. The data is not traveling anywhere because it appears to exist simultaneously here & there and when one changes the other does without delay. There has to be another dimension of energy / ether we need to discover that would make this make sense. Like looking into a fish pond but the fish don't see surface, only your hand dipping in water as a miraculous occurrence. 

jamescampbell.us
7032039877

> On Aug 4, 2016, at 5:58 PM, jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> From: juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:49:12 +0000 (UTC)
> jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> >> Apparently, that is true.   The tantalizing thing is that SOMETHING
> >> APPEARS   (information, of some nature) to be transferred between one
> >> particle and another, distant one, and yet there seems to be no way
> >> to use that transfer to actually transmit useful FTL 
> 
>  >  Which sounds rather absurd no?
> 
> Certainly that sounds absurd!   It IS absurd!  Which explains a lot of the fascination
> has for entangled photons and related phenomena.  Einstein never liked the 
> quantum-mechanics idea, famously declaring "God does not play dice with the
> universe".     Unfortunately for Einstein, dice are actually played.
> 
> In fact, Einstein's EPR Paradox (Einstein, Podolski, Rosen) was invented by
> Einstein himself in an attempt to prove that quantum mechanics could not
> be a complete statement of the problem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox 
> 
> This principle said that IF quantum mechanics 
> were a complete statement of the problem, then something seemingly 
> impossible [fill in the blank with FTL information travel] would occur.  Einstein was
> quite convinced that nothing (including no information) could travel faster than
> 'c'.  Amazingly, it appears that nature ("God", for the religious among you) has acted
> simultaneously to protect the quantum mechanics theory, but ALSO to protect 
> Einstein's belief that nothing could travel faster than 'c'.   If anybody should discover
> a method to use entangled photons to effectively transmit data FTL (and thus,
> presumably at infinite speed) that person would surely deserve a Nobel Prize in
> Physics.
> 
> 
>  >Either this is ordinary EM
>  > phenomena that propagate at the so called speed of light, or
>  > it is something else which could propagate at 'faster than
>  > light' speed. 
> 
> It's at least 10,000 times 'c' the speed of light in a vacuum, according to
> experiments involving fiber optics.  It might be essentially infinite.
> 
>   >  If 'something' is moving at faster than light speed, then some
>   > information must be being transmitted. If no information is
> >    being transmitted, then by definition, there's no way to measure
>   >  speed and the claim makes no sense.
> 
> Well, that's the problem.  Knowing that SOMETHING is being transmitted, and actually
> USING that method to transmit useful information, are (quite strangely) two different
> things.  That, also is the amazing implications of entangled photons.
> 
>                Jim Bell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 7869 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160804/f75010e7/attachment-0002.txt>