fish see surface but yes our perception but also the n dimension [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuvK-od647c Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance Published on Jan 12, 2015 Does quantum entanglement make faster-than-light communication possible? What is NOT random? [2]http://bit.ly/NOTrandoVe First, I know this video is not easy to understand. Thank you for taking the time to attempt to understand it. I've been working on this for over six months over which time my understanding has improved. Quantum entanglement and spooky action at a distance are still debated by professors of quantum physics (I know because I discussed this topic with two of them). Does hidden information (called hidden variables by physicists) exist? If it does, the experiment violating Bell inequalities indicates that hidden variables must update faster than light - they would be considered 'non-local'. On the other hand if you don't consider the spins before you make the measurement then you could simply say hidden variables don't exist and whenever you measure spins in the same direction you always get opposite results, which makes sense since angular momentum must be conserved in the universe. Everyone agrees that quantum entanglement does not allow information to be transmitted faster that light. There is no action either detector operator could take to signal the other one - regardless of the choice of measurement direction, the measured spins are random with 50/50 probability of up/down. Special thanks to: Prof. Stephen Bartlett, University of Sydney: [3]http://bit.ly/1xSosoJ Prof. John Preskill, Caltech: [4]http://bit.ly/1y8mJut Looking Glass Universe: [5]http://bit.ly/17zZH7l Physics Girl: [6]http://bit.ly/PhysGirl MinutePhysics: [7]http://bit.ly/MinPhys Community Channel: [8]http://bit.ly/CommChannel Nigel, Helen, Luke, and Simon for comments on earlier drafts of this video. Filmed in part by Scott Lewis: [9]http://google.com/+scottlewis Music by Amarante "One Last Time": [10]http://bit.ly/VeAmarante ++++++++++++++++ n dimension stuff [11]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI9uuHuc1iU&list=PL865E510770E164CB On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Sci Fith <[12]scfith@riseup.net> wrote: I believe our understanding of info transfer needs to change. The data is not traveling anywhere because it appears to exist simultaneously here & there and when one changes the other does without delay. There has to be another dimension of energy / ether we need to discover that would make this make sense. Like looking into a fish pond but the fish don't see surface, only your hand dipping in water as a miraculous occurrence. [13]jamescampbell.us [14]7032039877 On Aug 4, 2016, at 5:58 PM, jim bell <[15]jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote: From: juan <[16]juan.g71@gmail.com> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:49:12 +0000 (UTC) jim bell <[17]jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Apparently, that is true. The tantalizing thing is that SOMETHING >> APPEARS (information, of some nature) to be transferred between one >> particle and another, distant one, and yet there seems to be no way >> to use that transfer to actually transmit useful FTL > Which sounds rather absurd no? Certainly that sounds absurd! It IS absurd! Which explains a lot of the fascination has for entangled photons and related phenomena. Einstein never liked the quantum-mechanics idea, famously declaring "God does not play dice with the universe". Unfortunately for Einstein, dice are actually played. In fact, Einstein's EPR Paradox (Einstein, Podolski, Rosen) was invented by Einstein himself in an attempt to prove that quantum mechanics could not be a complete statement of the problem. [18]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox This principle said that IF quantum mechanics were a complete statement of the problem, then something seemingly impossible [fill in the blank with FTL information travel] would occur. Einstein was quite convinced that nothing (including no information) could travel faster than 'c'. Amazingly, it appears that nature ("God", for the religious among you) has acted simultaneously to protect the quantum mechanics theory, but ALSO to protect Einstein's belief that nothing could travel faster than 'c'. If anybody should discover a method to use entangled photons to effectively transmit data FTL (and thus, presumably at infinite speed) that person would surely deserve a Nobel Prize in Physics. >Either this is ordinary EM > phenomena that propagate at the so called speed of light, or > it is something else which could propagate at 'faster than > light' speed. It's at least 10,000 times 'c' the speed of light in a vacuum, according to experiments involving fiber optics. It might be essentially infinite. > If 'something' is moving at faster than light speed, then some > information must be being transmitted. If no information is > being transmitted, then by definition, there's no way to measure > speed and the claim makes no sense. Well, that's the problem. Knowing that SOMETHING is being transmitted, and actually USING that method to transmit useful information, are (quite strangely) two different things. That, also is the amazing implications of entangled photons. Jim Bell -- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 [19]carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <[20]https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited. References 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuvK-od647c 2. http://bit.ly/NOTrandoVe 3. http://bit.ly/1xSosoJ 4. http://bit.ly/1y8mJut 5. http://bit.ly/17zZH7l 6. http://bit.ly/PhysGirl 7. http://bit.ly/MinPhys 8. http://bit.ly/CommChannel 9. http://google.com/+scottlewis 10. http://bit.ly/VeAmarante 11. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI9uuHuc1iU&list=PL865E510770E164CB 12. mailto:scfith@riseup.net 13. http://jamescampbell.us/ 14. tel:7032039877 15. mailto:jdb10987@yahoo.com 16. mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com 17. mailto:jdb10987@yahoo.com 18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox 19. mailto:carimachet@gmail.com 20. https://twitter.com/carimachet