Bomb Law Reporter - special edition

[Aimee Farr]

Reese:

>  >[Some cpunk] wrote:
>  >
>  >>You are familiar with the terms "FUD" and "Propaganda" aren't you,
>  >>Aimee?  Is there a real case that can be cited properly?
>  >
>  >Accusing me of trickery on the tribunal? Himf. See US v. EATON,
>  >No 00-1276 (10th Cir. August 14, 2001).
>
> Skimmed it.  So the account was more real than not?

Verbatim.

> You are obviously
> willing and able to provide the real citation, so what purpose was
> served by changing all the names and obscuring the real cite, if
> trickery was not a factor?

No, Reese, I didn't want to expose an agent to Googling.

> Talking about yelling "Fire" in a crowded theater is not the same as
> doing it, no matter how "is" is defined, talking about bombs and making
> them is no different.  Who was it?  Said "I disagree with what you say
> but support your right to say it" or words to that effect?

A modern version: "I disagree with bomb recipes, but support your right to
provide bomb recipes, as long as I am not standing next to you, or
associated with you in any way." Things work differently now, see?

> I take it you have no interest in dealing with this topic seriously,
> it's evident you are having too much fun clowning around.

:)

~Aimee