Bomb Law Reporter - special edition

[Reese]

At 01:03 AM 8/17/01, Aimee Farr wrote:

 >> You are obviously
 >> willing and able to provide the real citation, so what purpose was
 >> served by changing all the names and obscuring the real cite, if
 >> trickery was not a factor?
 >
 >No, Reese, I didn't want to expose an agent to Googling.

Are court records public documents, or not?  Why wasn't that info sealed
if there was a problem with releasing it?

 >> Talking about yelling "Fire" in a crowded theater is not the same as
 >> doing it, no matter how "is" is defined, talking about bombs and making
 >> them is no different.  Who was it?  Said "I disagree with what you say
 >> but support your right to say it" or words to that effect?
 >
 >A modern version: "I disagree with bomb recipes, but support your right to
 >provide bomb recipes, as long as I am not standing next to you, or
 >associated with you in any way." Things work differently now, see?

No, I don't *see*.  There is no reason why they should work differently,
the relevant passages of the Constitution have not changed - the activism
in the courtrooms is telling though.

 >> I take it you have no interest in dealing with this topic seriously,
 >> it's evident you are having too much fun clowning around.
 >
 >:)
 >
 >~Aimee