[cddlm] Problems using Muse

[Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid]

Hi,

So, do you think Muse is a dead end?

I created by hand the "DeploymentFaultException" based on the 
"ComponentFaultException" which was generated and the compilation and 
deployment with Muse worked out.  It may be a problem with Muse, but I 
thought it was strange to see a message called "DeploymentFault" 
pointing to an element called "ComponentFault" which was of the type 
"DeploymentFaultType". That's why I'm not sure that this is not a 
problem with the specification. Does anyone see any problem in this part 
of the specification?

Regarding Muse use, I really appreciate your opinion about it. This 
latest version seems to be better, but now I would have to learn how to 
communicate with the deployed services and insert code into the 
generated code which will actually be the deployment engine. Steve gave 
me the advice of looking at their source code, as Muse documentation is 
not complete.

  Ayla


Steve Loughran wrote:

> Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I've changed to the new released version (in fact a SNAPSHOT) of 
>> Muse and I try to compile the generated code for the portal and 
>> system services, even do not changing anything in the generated code, 
>> I get an error indicating that the "DeploymentFaultException" file is 
>> missing (it was not generated). I saw that the 
>> "ComponentFaultException" was generated. I think that maybe there is 
>> a problem with the deployment-api.wsdl, in the part:
>>
>>    <wsdl:message name="DeploymentFault">
>>        <wsdl:part name="fault" element="cmp:ComponentFault"/>
>>    </wsdl:message>
>>
>> When I look at the component-model.xsd file cmp:ComponentFault 
>> element, I see that its type is cmp:DeploymentFaultType.
>>
>> I'm trying to solve it in several ways, but with my changes I get 
>> other exceptions. Does someone have an idea?
>>
>
> I think you are in the wonderful world of WSDL2Java generated stuff. 
> Ed and I wrote paper critiquing that very thing ( 
> http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2005/HPL-2005-83.html )
>
> the short term solution is to raise it with the muse mail list; point 
> them at the XSD/WSDL and see if it is a bug on their side.   I suspect 
> they could do with more test WSDL/XSD and so to get ours in there 
> would be a good bit of integration.
>
> Long term (2 weeks plus), well, we need to do a new SOAP stack, dont we?
>