[cddlm] Newer versions of xsds

[Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza]

Hi Stuart,

thanks a lot for your attention.

I think it is a good idea to update to the most recent versions, specially of
WS-Addressing due to its use in the MuWs specification.

Have a nice week!
   Ayla


On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:26:28 -0400, Stuart Schaefer wrote
> Ayla,
> 
> I am responsible for the component-model.xsd file.  I have not 
> opened it with Muse.  I will try that and see what has changed/broken.
> 
> The WS-Addressing schema has been a constant problem.  We are aware 
> of the discrepancies between the specifications.  Our problem has 
> been that MUWS uses a different set of specifications than some of 
> the WSRF specifications we are using.  Any change we make will 
> seemingly cause some problem.  It has been recommended that we 
> update to the most recent versions of all specifications and 
> continue to update as new specifications become available.
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Stuart Schaefer
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid
> [mailto:ayla at dsc.ufcg.edu.br] 
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:39 PM
> To: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid
> Cc: cddlm-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: [cddlm] Newer versions of xsds
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I've found the CVS repository under: 
> http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=123256
> but even replacing the component-model.xsd files, I continue with 
> the same problem while using Muse:"Content model violates the unique 
> particle attribution rule". I've got this problem before also with 
> the xml-cdl.xsd, but replacing with the new one it did not happen. 
> Has anyone else had the same problem? Is there a newer version of 
> this file?
> 
> Regarding ws-addressing, I've got confused, because the files point 
> to an older version of ws-addressing, but they use a muws-1.0 
> version that points to the new one. In a previous mail Steve has 
> said that you were aware of the changes in wsa. Are you planning to 
> change the documents to
> 
> the new version or it is this change that will lead to even more 
> internal inconsistency, as said before?
> 
> Best regards,
>   Ayla
> 
> Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > please, I would like to know how I can get the newest xml-cdl.xsd and 
> > component-model.xsd files?
> > Using the ones from the last versions of the specification documents, 
> > after correcting namespaces, I get the error:
> >
> > "Content model violates the unique particle attribution rule"
> >
> > This error is thrown when the schema is ambiguous.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >  Ayla
> >