[cddlm] Newer versions of xsds

Stuart Schaefer Sschaefer at softricity.com
Fri Jun 3 16:26:28 CDT 2005


Ayla,

I am responsible for the component-model.xsd file.  I have not opened it
with Muse.  I will try that and see what has changed/broken.

The WS-Addressing schema has been a constant problem.  We are aware of
the discrepancies between the specifications.  Our problem has been that
MUWS uses a different set of specifications than some of the WSRF
specifications we are using.  Any change we make will seemingly cause
some problem.  It has been recommended that we update to the most recent
versions of all specifications and continue to update as new
specifications become available.

Any suggestions?

Stuart Schaefer

-----Original Message-----
From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid
[mailto:ayla at dsc.ufcg.edu.br] 
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:39 PM
To: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid
Cc: cddlm-wg at ggf.org
Subject: Re: [cddlm] Newer versions of xsds

Hello,

I've found the CVS repository under: 
http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=123256
but even replacing the component-model.xsd files, I continue with the 
same problem while using Muse:"Content model violates the unique 
particle attribution rule". I've got this problem before also with the 
xml-cdl.xsd, but replacing with the new one it did not happen.
Has anyone else had the same problem? Is there a newer version of this
file?

Regarding ws-addressing, I've got confused, because the files point to 
an older version of ws-addressing, but they use a muws-1.0 version that 
points to the new one. In a previous mail Steve has said that you were 
aware of the changes in wsa. Are you planning to change the documents to

the new version or it is this change that will lead to even more 
internal inconsistency, as said before?

Best regards,
  Ayla






Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid wrote:

> Hi,
>
> please, I would like to know how I can get the newest xml-cdl.xsd and 
> component-model.xsd files?
> Using the ones from the last versions of the specification documents, 
> after correcting namespaces, I get the error:
>
> "Content model violates the unique particle attribution rule"
>
> This error is thrown when the schema is ambiguous.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>  Ayla
>






More information about the cddlm-wg mailing list