[acs-wg] OGSA roadmap input

Michael Behrens behrens at r2ad.com
Sat May 14 11:18:37 CDT 2005


The list of specifications needs to be expanded perhaps.  I am a little 
confused too on what kind of standards need to be listed.  I presume it 
should be those which the specification depends, not the 
implementation.  Suggestions?

I changed the "Excepted Users" section to say:

The ACS specification, to be developed by the ACS-WG, is expected to be 
use initially by the NAREGI project in Japan.   Generally, any job 
execution management implementations can begin using the specification 
by recognizing the ACS namespace for application content references and 
invoking the services to obtain the application and data.

I'd like to get this to Jem before Monday's OGSA telecon.

Ziu, Peter wrote:

>Mike, thanks for taking the initiative to get things started.  Looks good, but I am unfamiliar with the dates and status of WS-Naming and Solution Installation.  I presume you have referenced those dates to check schedule fit, or is this the purpose of the roadmap folks to help sort out?
>
>What about specifications that any grid service need to implement?  Do we mention these in the "referenced specifications"?  Is ACS considered a grid managed service?  There are many potential circular dependency issues to work out if so;  i.e., if I am a service within the grid container, then I must reference and utilize certain base specification implementations that all grid managed services must so that I can be started, stopped, restarted, installed, removed, scaled and de-scaled.  If ACS is a service dependency to any of the just mentioned functions then we are awash in chicken/egg issues (what comes first, the chicken or the egg), and will we need to sort these out in order to produce the "referenced specifications" table.
>
>Pete
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-acs-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-acs-wg at ggf.org]On Behalf Of
>Michael Behrens
>Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 9:22 PM
>To: acs-wg at ggf.org
>Subject: [acs-wg] OGSA roadmap input
>
>
>Team,
>We need to provide some input to the OGSA roadmap document before next 
>wednesday.  (I presumed we would like to be listed in the roadmap)
>I wrote up a draft and am attaching it for your review and input.
>This is the template document and I only changed section 4.1.
>
>Please check the table of dates that I derived from the charter too.  
>Thanks.
>
>  
>

-- 
Michael Behrens
R2AD, LLC
(571) 594-3008 (cell) *new*
(703) 714-0442 (land)





More information about the acs-wg mailing list