FW: FW: [acs-wg] scrm-pvt - first draft of Landscape Information doc for ACS

[Ziu, Peter]

Hiro, 
 
Attached is ACS's landscape contribution to SCRM.  
 
Pete
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-acs-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-acs-wg at ggf.org]On Behalf Of pete at ziu.net
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:18 PM
To: Keisuke Fukui
Cc: acs-wg at ggf.org
Subject: Re: FW: [acs-wg] scrm-pvt - first draft of Landscape Information doc for ACS



Keisuke, 

Thank you very much for the valuable comments. I will encorporate them and resend the updated doc for Wed.


Pete Ziu
571.235.0208 (c)
mailto:pete at ziu.net (h)
mailto:5712350208 at tmomail.net (sms)




To "Ziu, Peter" <peter.ziu at ngc.com>
cc acs-wg at ggf.org
bcc 
Subject Re: FW: [acs-wg] scrm-pvt - first draft of Landscape Information doc for ACS
Keisuke Fukui <kfukui at labs.fujitsu.com>
Sent by: owner-acs-wg at ggf.org
07/12/2005 09:25 AM ZE9
<font size=-1></font>




Hi Pete,

Thanks for compilation of the information. It is fine for the most part.

Item 9: English.
Item 15, 16: GGF, I guess. However, for the URI for the rules, the admin of
the scrm will find the most appropriate URI. So let's leave them
as blank. Or "(GGF)" looks better?
Item 18: Not sure if we can fill here with planned but not yet visible
implementation. I guess this corresponds to the adoption columns
standard status table we saw at the GGF14 scrm meeting. So I think
"NAREGI project and Business Grid project has plans" would be a
fair description.
Item 19: We are not referring CDDLM *normatively*, but will just demonstrate
or introduce the capability to interact with CDDLM. For the Solution
Installation, we will eventually refer it in some way, but not yet.
So I think "We are expecting that OASIS SDD is referred normatively."
would be a fair description.
Item 20: Yes. Let's fill here with "OGSA v1"

These are the all comments from me. I don't have any issues on all others you
filled. My apologies to my late response.

-Keisuke


Ziu, Peter wrote:
> Does anyone have any comments/corrections on/to this document before it
> goes to Hiro? (see attached) If we could get a review of this document
> on the agenda for next meeting (or just comments in email) it would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Pete.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* owner-acs-wg at ggf.org [ mailto:owner-acs-wg at ggf.org]*On Behalf Of
> *pete at ziu.net
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 07, 2005 7:16 PM
> *To:* kfukui at labs.fujitsu.com
> *Cc:* acs-wg at ggf.org
> *Subject:* [acs-wg] scrm-pvt - first draft of Landscape Information doc
> for ACS
>
> Keisuke and group,
>
> I have been requested by Hiro to submit the SCRM draft Landscape
> Information doc for ACS specification to him, so that he may pass it up
> to SCRM. This is an informational document about all specs of interest
> within SCRM, to help sort out the numerous efforts in the management
> space. I have updated the form I originally sent to you to the latest
> draft version. I have inserted comments since it is in need of review. I
> would like to make sure I am properly reflecting ACS facts. Tom, might
> you find time to review as well (especially the check box things[Ziu, Peter] )     ? Do you
> think we might be able to review next meeting?
>
> Pete Ziu
> 571.235.0208 (c)
> mailto:pete at ziu.net (h)
> mailto:5712350208 at tmomail.net (sms)
>







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/acs-wg/attachments/20050712/1ab65ed6/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sdo-template-draft-v3-ACS.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 62976 bytes
Desc: sdo-template-draft-v3-ACS.doc
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/acs-wg/attachments/20050712/1ab65ed6/attachment.doc