I can *almost* guarantee that vulnerabilities which are not exploitable are not exploited. -Travis On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Razer wrote:

On 10/16/2015 10:14 AM, Michael Best wrote:

...

A masterful troll spoiled by the standard protection against malicious/fake unsubscribe requests. Oh, if only I had accounted for it! I received one too, and several times during the last few weeks I've gotten emails telling me that someone was trying to log into my freelists settings. I have no idea who it was, so I'm not going to accuse anyone without any evidence whatsoever. Glad to see you're not jumping to conclusions, Occam's Rayzer. ;-)

Your trolling the list with the basically useless information that JYA sold logs THAT HIS SITE OPERATION MAY NOT HAVE GENERATED (they may be netsol's right?) created a spike in the use of the word "Cryptome" etc on the radar of hackers and spammers, so yeah, you're responsible Mike.

I can almost guarantee it wouldn't have happened without you.

RR

...

And there you have it... The end result of Mike Best's troll... Gleaned addresses being run through cryptome's listerver. The server admin could detail from which IP these requests originated. RR -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Ecartis command results: unsubscribe Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:17:32 -0400 (EDT) From: FreeLists Mailing List Manager mailto:ecartis@freelists.org> To: rayzer Request received for list 'cryptome' via request address. >>/unsubscribe /'Unsubscribe' request denied. Your request was rejected for the following reason: You are not on the list 'cryptome'.

-- Twitter https://twitter.com/tbiehn | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn | GitHub http://github.com/tbiehn | TravisBiehn.com http://www.travisbiehn.com | Google Plus https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn