I can almost guarantee that vulnerabilities which are not exploitable are not exploited.

-Travis

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:


On 10/16/2015 10:14 AM, Michael Best wrote:
> A masterful troll spoiled by the standard protection against malicious/fake unsubscribe requests. Oh, if only I had accounted for it!
> I received one too, and several times during the last few weeks I've gotten emails telling me that someone was trying to log into my freelists settings. I have no idea who it was, so I'm not going to accuse anyone without any evidence whatsoever.
> Glad to see you're not jumping to conclusions, Occam's Rayzer. ;-)
>
>


Your trolling the list with the basically useless information that JYA
sold logs THAT HIS SITE OPERATION MAY NOT HAVE GENERATED (they may be
netsol's right?) created a spike in the use of the word "Cryptome" etc
on the radar of hackers and spammers, so yeah, you're responsible Mike.

I can almost guarantee it wouldn't have happened without you.

RR


>     And there you have it... The end result of Mike Best's troll...
>     Gleaned
>     addresses being run through cryptome's listerver. The server admin
>     could
>     detail from which IP these requests originated. RR --------
>     Forwarded Message --------
>     Subject: Ecartis command results: unsubscribe
>     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:17:32 -0400 (EDT)
>     From: FreeLists Mailing List Manager <ecartis@freelists.org
>     <mailto:ecartis@freelists.org>>
>     To: rayzer Request received for list 'cryptome' via request
>     address. >>/unsubscribe /'Unsubscribe' request denied.
>     Your request was rejected for the following reason: You are not on
>     the list 'cryptome'.
>
>





--
Twitter | LinkedIn | GitHub | TravisBiehn.com | Google Plus