-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <199412112031.MAA21646@netcom12.netcom.com>, mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos) wrote:
Now all the lame press (and some even LAMER USENET readers) are screaming foul. I bet there will be renewed interest in the cypherpunk remailer's in the next few days :>
I suppose this means we need strong laws against "message laundering."
Hey, don't kid yourself! I have read comments to the extent that anon remailers like the cypherpunks system should be BANNED! Seriously....another good reason for putting more in Europe if possible. Here's an idea. Someone mentioned trying to set up an anon remailer on the North American Freenets, but it seemed there were software compatibility problems. Well, if we could solve the problem, assuming the Freenets in Europe use the same software, we could set a few up in Europe ourselves from this side of the pond. You could telnet into a Euro-Freenet (although some like Helsinki had restrictions on members being citizens of the country) establish an account and then e-mail the software to your account overseas. Would this be practical? Sounds like it would be worth a shot. But again, I guess it comes down to the software compatibility problem. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBLuuFcHBFBj7pSNyhAQF61gf/ZyrleHTVK61ruT7SvT+3BOHTYNo1eZHa FMnEoMDGm99f0Ckr8pFwAMQcBSMEeskdg2OKjluVG8KG5y4zvejueGqElETiAkbB XkOK+v1iAe8WFFyy3Fu0lYR/jfEcghOf1WmaJ7IRn/XTPgSlS0k21iXBC1tHSEhZ guQRXLZC3XW8DPXBC61F2fzID/ogvXE9ATvyxEem88BOnAyUwXNsk649biGFrczh grwGT3BUxYMk3zYTYusnC9XxUZ3JjtbiLVpZ+9e8GKNTtyR3qqxJhloZBBOxDlyx kUH1lhNeI8qWHsaZQui1FrsG+O15ZHV7/d8Rk7teXLMFBafgJRpEHQ== =0VL9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----