Ironically, I did not know about this brouhaha until reading about it here today. A few days ago I got this email: Subject: Premier Bob To: hfinney@jobe.shell.portal.com Date: Fri, 9 Dec 94 8:10:36 EST Congrulations! Your forgery made the Globe and Mail today. This meant nothing to me so I ignored it. But on reading the article this appears to be a major incident, involving heated accusations and walkouts on the floor of the Ontario legislature. The Portal system, the internet service provider I use, has apparently taken some heat but they have not contacted me. A thread in can.politics titled "The Bob Rae Forgery Caper" includes a copy of the original message. Here are some excerpts from the Globe and Mail article, which was widely cross-posted.
TORONTO - Progressive Conservative Leader Michael Harris caused an uproar in the Ontario Legislature yesterday by presenting a prank letter circulating on the Internet computer system that is purported to have been written by Premier Bob Rae. The computer message has Mr. Rae making tasteless references to Ontario's Attorney-General Marion Boyd and commenting on the trial of Karla Homolka, who was convicted in the slayings of two Ontario schoolgirls. A copy of the letter obtained by The Globe and Mail warns that "this message is NOT from the person listed in the from line. It is from an automated software remailing service" in California. This message was on the letter from the time the company received it and passed it on to the computer bulletin board where Internet users can read it, said Gwen Rachlin, director of operations for Portal Communications of Cupertino, Calif., through which the message was posted. [...] Ms. Rachlin said the company received a call from police about the letter yesterday afternoon. But she said the company had already had "some incidents" with the source of the message. She added that she was ready to co-operate with the police. The source of the message was an account that provides a service that allows people anonymous access to the Internet, she said. Mr. Sherman said it is very easy to post a false message on a bulletin board and to make it appear that it came from a computer different from the one that sent it. By going through a California bulletin board, "obviously someone has gone way out of their way to send that in," Mr. Sherman added. Even so, the message can be traced, said Rick Broadhead, co- author of The Canadian Internet Handbook. "If they [the sender] have gone through a service, it is going to take some more work to trace it," Mr. Broadhead said. But looking at the log records of the computer service, police can follow the message back to the originating computer.
I do not have any logs of this message. However, my remailer does not insert any delays so it is conceivable that sendmail logs could give some insight into message flow through the remailer. I don't know what obligation I would be under to cooperate with any investigation. The message itself had some pointed political satire but did not look to me to violate any US laws. There is not much I can do to help, anyway. The article indicated that the legislature has now gone into recess for the year so hopefully this will all be old news by the time they reconvene. One thing I do notice on reading the discussion in can.politics is the fact that despite the disclaimers in the message headers, some people took this as a forgery attempt on my part. I wonder if it might be necessary to insert disclaimers into the body of the message as anon.penet.fi does, at least for messages to known mail-to-news gateways. There was also a misperception that my remailer was an official effort endorsed by Portal (again, despite the disclaimers). Note that it was they who were contacted, not me (yet). This might suggest that it will not be possible to cleanly separate the remailer operators and service providers when problems like this arise. Both may end up being hassled (time will tell whether I am). It should be interesting to see what happens. Hal