[UR-WG] Actions for next phone meeting on 07/02/2012

[john.gordon at stfc.ac.uk]

My apologies too. I am in a WLCG Meeting all day. 

In response to Mike's point on standards taking time; yesbut once a document exists then it is useful right away because sites/systems/infrastructure can choose to follow it and then we benefit from real world feedback on what we have proposed. 

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ur-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:ur-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of
> Mike Jones
> Sent: 07 February 2012 13:05
> To: ur-wg at ogf.org
> Subject: Re: [UR-WG] Actions for next phone meeting on 07/02/2012
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> My apologies, I will not be able to make the meeting today due to being
> roped into an NGS Collaboration Board meeting.
> 
> I've managed to put one "use case" in the wiki, but...
> 
> I will say that there seems to be usecases that are better dealt with
> using either some monitoring protocol or some advertising protocol.
> 
> Remember that URs may not work their way through the system for a time.
> There is no requirement to provide URs in a timely fashion.  To try to
> make it so would be out of scope for a UR spec.
> 
> Status information within a UR will be of limited value, except when
> exploring usage in a historical context.
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Monday 06 February 2012 13:21:37 Andrea Cristofori wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I and Jon prepared the agenda for next OGF:
> >
> > - New charter + Timeline
> > - Info doc from EMI
> > - Wrap up from last OGF
> > - UR2.0
> >    - Requirements
> >    - Use cases
> >    - Record blocks under consideration
> >    - Fields under consideration
> > -AOB
> >
> >
> > We can discuss tomorrow about it and if we need an extra session.
> > Tomorrow agenda will follow the actions from last phone conference:
> >
> > - All: write some use cases on the wiki
> > - All: check the attributes on the wiki page and give comments
> > - All: comments on the document:
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1953002/StAR-OGF-info-doc-v1.docx
> > - CA & JKN: split the common block in two parts (recordidentity and
> > useridentity) and add some attributes (issuer, authorization type,
> > wheretheusercamefrom,...)
> > - CA & JKN: write a preliminary agenda for next OGF
> > - JKN: change the title on the document to reflect the fact that it
> is
> > not an OGF document and circulate it before next meeting
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andrea and Jon
> >
> > On 01/24/2012 05:17 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > here is a list of actions for next phone meeting
> > >
> > > - All: write some use cases on the wiki
> > > - All: check the attributes on the wiki page and give comments
> > > - All: comments on the document:
> > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1953002/StAR-OGF-info-doc-v1.docx
> > > - CA & JKN: split the common block in two parts (recordidentity and
> > > useridentity) and add some attributes (issuer, authorization type,
> > > wheretheusercamefrom,...)
> > > - CA & JKN: write a preliminary agenda for next OGF
> > > - JKN: change the title on the document to reflect the fact that it
> > > is not an OGF document and circulate it before next meeting
> > >
> > > If I forgot something please feel free to add.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Andrea
-- 
Scanned by iCritical.