[ur-wg] XML Changes/Questions: Comment #6c & #9
Sven van den Berghe
Sven.vandenBerghe at uk.fujitsu.com
Fri May 5 02:08:27 CDT 2006
Just to note that there is some current discussion in the SAGA and
BES groups on
a common state model, perhaps the base set should be aligned with the
results
of this.
On 4 May 2006, at 16:50, Laura F McGinnis wrote:
>> 6c) 3.9 Status "This property represents the completion status
>> of the job" and goes on to say that "it must support the following
>> values: a) completed b) failed
>> c) aborted
>> d) held
>> e) queued
>> f) started
>> g) suspended"
>>
>> This is a rather batch system specific approach. In a grid usage
>> record we are talking about 'final' or completion status of a grid
>> job. In this sense differentiating between "held, queued, started,
>> suspended" has not much relevance. It would be better to merge
>> these 4 active states into one "unfinished" state.
>>
>> BTW, NorduGrid uses the Finished, Failed, Killed, Deleted labels
>> for completed job states. The NorduGrid "Finish, Failed, Killed"
>> corresponds to the GGF "completed, failed, aborted", respectively
>> while the NorduGrid "Deleted" does not exists in th GGF states
>> (see page 26 about nordugrid-job-status in [3])
>> The statement "This property must contain data of type integer"
>> implies that the proposed job states above also should carry an
>> associated number, in this case. Evaluation: Text and definition
>> will be changed to user tokens for status. A base set will be
>> defined, but the comprehensive set of values will be extensible.
>
>
>> 9) The appended schema mandates the inclusion of the “status”
>> field. This is described as a must in section 3.9 but is not
>> specifically included as a must in section 10.6. Further the
>> allowed values in 10.6 are not enforced in the Schema (this might
>> be okay as other values are allowed). Suggest that this is
>> removed as a mandatory record as it is not applicable in the
>> general case (what about data records?) Evaluation: Status should
>> be a token (see above) and should be optional.
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++
> Laura F. McGinnis, Project Coordinator
> Data & Information Resource Services
> Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center email:
> lfm at psc.edu
> 300 South Craig Street, #313 voice:
> 412-268-5642
> Pittsburgh, PA 15213
> fax: 412-268-8200
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++
Sven
Sven.vandenBerghe at uk.fujitsu.com
Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe
+44 208 606 4651
More information about the ur-wg
mailing list