[scrm-wg] SCRM Meeting Monday 3/27

[Tom Roney]

Is there a need to update our current GGF pages
regarding the liaison activity?

Referring to the URI provided by Winston regarding
our Press announcement:

  http://www.ggf.org/News/GGF%20-%20SCRM%20Final.pdf

it occurs to me that EGA is not mentioned in the list
of SDOs.  Should they be?

Note, too, these two GGF web sites, which reference
each other:

  http://www.ggf.org/ggf_abt_liaisons.htm
  http://www.ggf.org/ggf_areas_liaison.htm

The first site says that "GGF has liaison activities
with key standards organizations such as IETF, W3C,
OASIS, and WS/I , SNIA, DMTF, EGA and others.  Hiro
is listed as the Liaison Rep for "Standards Development
Organizations" -- defined as "a collaborative effort
being coordinated by GGF across several standards
organizations."

Just a "heads up."

Tom

On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:56:24AM -0600, Winston_Bumpus at Dell.com wrote:
> As part of our discussion for a Press announcement, We should probably
> build on our previous announcement
> http://www.ggf.org/News/GGF%20-%20SCRM%20Final.pdf
> 
> 
> Winston Bumpus
> Director, Systems Management Architecture and Standards
> Dell Inc.
> 512.724.7164| voice
> Standards at Dell
> www.dell.com/standards
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf Of
> Mark A. Carlson
> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 10:40 PM
> To: scrm-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: [scrm-wg] SCRM Meeting Monday 3/27
> 
> Usual time: 6am PST, 7am MST, 9am EST
> 
> Call info:
> 
> (866)5455227 code: 6300276#
> Int'l: (865)673-6950
> 
> Wiki site for SCRM maintenance.
> http://testforge.ggf.org/sf/go/projects.scrm-wg/wiki
> 
> 1) Review integrated landscape document, templates and progress on
> categorizing the standards according to the landscape.
>     a) IETF RFCs - Thanks Winston!
>     b) ITU and TMF - Thanks Tom!
>     c) Oasis plus picture in landscape?
> 
> 2) Further planning for going "live" at GGF17 Tokyo
>   a)  Press release draft?
>   b) GridConnection article?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- mark