Updates to IETF related material in WIKI [was: RE: [scrm-wg] Note s from SCRM Meeting Monday 4/10]

[Hiro Kishimoto]

Thanks Bert for your update. It looks great.

Linking the second paragraph to SMTP page (= STD62 and RFC3410)
is fine by me. But the first paragraph (SMIv2, STD58 and RFC2578)
also have a link (actually the first word of the heading "SMTP")
to SMTP page. I think it should link to STD58/RFC2578 instead.

Your thoughts?
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> As agreed yesterday, 
> 
> I have now updated the first page at:
> 
>    http://testforge.ggf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.scrm-wg/wiki/HomePage
> 
> I made a clearer disticting between STD58, STD62 and additional documents.
> I am checking with Dan Romascanu (the new AD for the IETF OPS area) if
> he is OK with that. But anyone who has a comment, pls let me know.
> 
> I am now looking at:
> 
>   http://testforge.ggf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.scrm-wg/wiki/SNMP
> 
> Seems to need some updates too. I am working on it.
> 
> Bert
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org]On Behalf Of
>>Mark A. Carlson
>>Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 15:43
>>To: scrm-wg at ggf.org
>>Subject: [scrm-wg] Notes from SCRM Meeting Monday 4/10
>>
>>
>>* Tom Roney
>>* Winston Bumpus
>>* Joel Replogle
>>* Hiro Kishimoto
>>* Bert Wijnen
>>* Dan Romascanu
>>Vincent Francesini
>>* Heather Kreger
>>Dave Sidor
>>* Mark Carlson
>>Jay Unger
>>* Eric Seymour (Bridgeman Communications)
>>
>>* attended
>>
>>Bert discussed his concerns about over selling the accomplishments of 
>>the group in the proposed press release. He would be happier if we 
>>clarified that it is a 10,000 foot view.
>>
>>We also discussed making the press release more of an 
>>invitation to help 
>>keep the wiki updated. The goal should not be chest pounding. 
>>The goal 
>>should be to get involvement in keeping the wiki site updated with 
>>ongoing development of and collaboration by SDOs.
>>
>>Bert mentioned that we need to be careful not to stress too much the 
>>uniqueness of the effort given the NGNMFG work. We do have 
>>uniqueness in 
>>having it in wiki form that makes it more of a living 
>>document. We will 
>>be careful not to usurp authority that we don't have. We are 
>>trying to 
>>overcome the perception that standards bodies work in a 
>>vacuum. There is 
>>some forum shopping going on as people take their ideas to more 
>>sympathetic groups - the main benefit of this work should be to make 
>>that less likely by increasing its visibility.
>>
>>Eric will soften the press release and craft it more along 
>>the lines of 
>>an invitation and send back through Steve Crumb. He will try 
>>and get it 
>>to Steve by Wednesday.
>>Eric asked about search or shortcut functions. The "Search 
>>Wiki Pages" 
>>function on test forge seems to be broken.
>>
>>All press release quotes should be approved and finalized by 
>>April 21st. 
>>We will meet again next week to review progress on the press release.
>>
> 
> 
> 
>