GGF17 Press release draft (Re: [scrm-wg] SCRM Meeting Monday 4/10)

[Hiro Kishimoto]

Hi Bert,

There are real contents on the wiki page we have archived.
AFAIK, it is the first time that experts from multiple SDOs agreed
the following resource management stuffs.
- Glossary
- Unified architecture
- Taxonomy

http://testforge.ggf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.scrm-wg/wiki/Landscape

I'm sorry you could not attend these discussions so much in the
past.

Also, you have committed but could not make IETF summary.

On Nov. 29, 2005, Bert Wijnen wrote:
> Yet, when I get back from vacation, I will again try to
> find some time for this. Feel free to remind me after 
> Dec 13th.

Winston was kind enough to make them in your place.

http://testforge.ggf.org/sf/go/projects.scrm-wg/wiki

I would very much appreciate if you could have a look into the latest
summary for IETF specs (SNMP and NETCONF) and give us your technical
feedbacks.

Thanks,
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> I am very sorry that I have to AGAIN express my disagreement with
> the focus on BOGUS (basically EMPTY) press releases that claim
> MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT while it has taken us 2 years to get from
> some emails, to a word document, to a web page, to a spreadsheet
> and now converted to a WIKI page. WHAT in hell is the ACHIEVEMENT?
> 
> Also, the press release seems to claim as if real EXPERTS from all
> the listed organizations have participated. In my view it has just been 
> some leadership that is on and off at random on weekly conf calls.
> Most of the time on the conf calls , the discussion is about the
> next meeting, or how to convert from (for example) spreadsheet to
> wiki (I wonder what the next hip thing is we're going to do)... i.e
> very little real content. And the IETF (and I suspect most other
> organizations) have NOT had their EXPERTs participate. I suspect
> it is/was more that some of the leadership "shielded" their EXPERTS
> from this type of discussion and made sure that their EXPERTS
> could work on real issues and new protocols or information models.
> 
> Let us be realistic guys... and not make this a publicity circus.
> 
> Bert (no longer an AD in the IETF, so maybe I am speaking too
> freely and too rude now).
> 
> Bert
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org]On Behalf Of
>>Hiro Kishimoto
>>Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 07:06
>>To: Mark.Carlson at Sun.COM
>>Cc: scrm-wg at ggf.org
>>Subject: GGF17 Press release draft (Re: [scrm-wg] SCRM Meeting Monday
>>4/10)
>>
>>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Joel and I write up press release draft on our wiki landscape 
>>document.
>>Please have a look and give your feedback by email or upcoming Monday
>>call.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>-- 
>>Hiro Kishimoto
>>
>>Mark A. Carlson wrote:
>>
>>>Usual time: 6am PST, 7am MST, 9am EST
>>>
>>>Call info:
>>>
>>>(866)5455227 code: 6300276#
>>>Int'l: (865)673-6950
>>>
>>>Wiki site for SCRM maintenance.
>>>http://testforge.ggf.org/sf/go/projects.scrm-wg/wiki
>>>
>>>1) Review integrated landscape document, templates and
>>>progress on categorizing the standards according to the
>>>landscape.
>>>  a)  Oasis - Thank Heather
>>>
>>>2) Further planning for going "live" at GGF17 Tokyo
>>>a)  Press release draft?
>>>b) GridConnection article?
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>-- mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
>