[SAGA-RG] python bindings

[M.A. Santcroos]

Hi Sylvain,

On 9/2/11 10:40 , "Sylvain Reynaud" <Sylvain.Reynaud at in2p3.fr> wrote:
>Andre, I think you're right about the reason for the create() method ;
>it can indeed return a Task object that will contain the created object.

I don't really understand that. So how does that differ from the LSU
functionality?

>Mark, FYI you can configure JSAGA's "local://" adaptor to be mapped to
>URL scheme "fork://"... but anyway, there are many other differences
>between URL of various SAGA implementations (independently of the
>implemented binding). The other main difference between SAGA
>implementations is between the security contexts.

How come? Was there too much room for interpretation in the spec?

>So if you want to develop an application that uses several SAGA
>implementations, creating URLs and security contexts will require
>implementation-specific code anyway.

I don't consider that a feature obviously.
It kind of defeats the purpose of having a standard API.

Cheers,

Mark