[SAGA-RG] [jsdl-wg] FINAL CALL on SPMDApplication

[Andre Merzky]

Thanks for feedback, Pascal!

Well, I propose to tread that issue as public comment, and
to apply the fix before re-submission (I hope our AD's, who
are listening on this list, are so friendly to ignore this
slight break of protocol ;)

Cheers, Andre.


Quoting [Pascal Kleijer] (Apr 04 2007):
> From: Pascal Kleijer <k-pasukaru at ap.jp.nec.com>
> To: Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>
> CC: SAGA RG <saga-rg at ogf.org>
> Subject: Re: [SAGA-RG] [jsdl-wg] FINAL CALL on SPMDApplication
> 
> Dear Andre and SAGA folx,
> 
> To make the answer short, yes I think we should support this in the SAGA 
> Job package. At the moment we have these fields with other names because 
> we use the NAREGI definition. However I am pretty sure that NAREGI will 
> migrate to the official OGF spec would it be released (NAREGI people are 
> also behind this spec anyway). That means that if we have a SAGA 
> implementation of the Job package we will support them, even if this 
> deviates from the SAGA spec.
> 
> Best regards,
> Pascal Kleijer
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>   HPC Marketing Promotion Division, NEC Corporation
>   1-10, Nisshin-cho, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-8501, Japan.
>   Tel: +81-(0)42/333.6389       Fax: +81-(0)42/333.6382
>   http://www2.nec.co.jp/online-tv/en/introduction/society/met_h.html
> 
> Andre Merzky wrote:
> >The attachement eaters took their toll.  Lets try again!
> >
> >Cheers, Andre.
> >
> >Quoting [Andre Merzky] (Mar 13 2007):
> >>From: Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>
> >>To: SAGA RG <saga-rg at ogf.org>
> >>Subject: Fwd: [jsdl-wg] FINAL CALL on SPMDApplication
> >>
> >>Hi Folx, 
> >>
> >>Attached is the current draft of the SPMD extension of JSDL
> >>(JSDL SPMD Application Extension, Version 1.0).
> >>
> >>The extension is fairly simple.  Roughly spoken, the draft
> >>introduces three new elements(*) used to describe parallel
> >>applications.  These elements are:
> >>
> >>  NumberOfProcesses  (integer)
> >>  ProcessesPerHost   (integer)
> >>  ThreadsPerProcess  (integer)
> >>  SPMDVariation      (MPI/GridMPI/...)
> >>
> >>The JSDL grop would certainly be happy about comments.
> >>
> >>Apart from that, we should consider to add these elements to
> >>our job description.  Any opinion about that?
> >>
> >>Cheers, Andre.
> >>
> >>
> >>----- Forwarded message from Andreas Savva <andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com> 
> >>-----
> >>
> >>>From: Andreas Savva <andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com>
> >>>To: Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>
> >>>Subject: [Fwd: [jsdl-wg] FINAL CALL on SPMDApplication (was [Fwd:
> >>>	SPMDApplication draft 6 and request for parallel application names])]
> >>>
> >>>Hi Andre,
> >>>
> >>>I think at OGF19 I promised to send you an email when the parallel 
> >>>application extension went to final call within the jsdl group.
> >>>
> >>>Comments welcome.
> >>>Andreas
> >>>From: Andreas Savva <andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com>
> >>>To: Mailing List for JSDL-WG <jsdl-wg at ogf.org>
> >>>Subject: [jsdl-wg] FINAL CALL on SPMDApplication (was [Fwd: 
> >>>SPMDApplication
> >>>	draft 6 and request for parallel application names])
> >>>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I have not received any comments on the draft posted last week and there 
> >>>are no outstanding issues. As we discussed on the last call I am putting 
> >>>this now in final call within the group. The plan is to submit it to the 
> >>>OGF Editor for public comment at the end of the week (Friday 16).
> >>>
> >>>For those who may not be familiar with the process, after submission to 
> >>>the OGF Editor this document will enter a public comment period of 
> >>>60-days so you will have plenty of time to comment later on.
> >>>
> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>  saga-rg mailing list
> >>>  saga-rg at ogf.org
> >>>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/saga-rg



-- 
"XML is like violence: if it does not help, use more."