[SAGA-RG] [jsdl-wg] FINAL CALL on SPMDApplication

[Pascal Kleijer]

Dear Andre and SAGA folx,

To make the answer short, yes I think we should support this in the SAGA 
Job package. At the moment we have these fields with other names because 
we use the NAREGI definition. However I am pretty sure that NAREGI will 
migrate to the official OGF spec would it be released (NAREGI people are 
also behind this spec anyway). That means that if we have a SAGA 
implementation of the Job package we will support them, even if this 
deviates from the SAGA spec.

Best regards,
Pascal Kleijer

----------------------------------------------------------------
   HPC Marketing Promotion Division, NEC Corporation
   1-10, Nisshin-cho, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-8501, Japan.
   Tel: +81-(0)42/333.6389       Fax: +81-(0)42/333.6382
   http://www2.nec.co.jp/online-tv/en/introduction/society/met_h.html

Andre Merzky wrote:
> The attachement eaters took their toll.  Lets try again!
> 
> Cheers, Andre.
> 
> Quoting [Andre Merzky] (Mar 13 2007):
>> From: Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>
>> To: SAGA RG <saga-rg at ogf.org>
>> Subject: Fwd: [jsdl-wg] FINAL CALL on SPMDApplication
>>
>> Hi Folx, 
>>
>> Attached is the current draft of the SPMD extension of JSDL
>> (JSDL SPMD Application Extension, Version 1.0).
>>
>> The extension is fairly simple.  Roughly spoken, the draft
>> introduces three new elements(*) used to describe parallel
>> applications.  These elements are:
>>
>>   NumberOfProcesses  (integer)
>>   ProcessesPerHost   (integer)
>>   ThreadsPerProcess  (integer)
>>   SPMDVariation      (MPI/GridMPI/...)
>>
>> The JSDL grop would certainly be happy about comments.
>>
>> Apart from that, we should consider to add these elements to
>> our job description.  Any opinion about that?
>>
>> Cheers, Andre.
>>
>>
>> ----- Forwarded message from Andreas Savva <andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com> -----
>>
>>> From: Andreas Savva <andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com>
>>> To: Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>
>>> Subject: [Fwd: [jsdl-wg] FINAL CALL on SPMDApplication (was [Fwd:
>>> 	SPMDApplication draft 6 and request for parallel application names])]
>>>
>>> Hi Andre,
>>>
>>> I think at OGF19 I promised to send you an email when the parallel 
>>> application extension went to final call within the jsdl group.
>>>
>>> Comments welcome.
>>> Andreas
>>> From: Andreas Savva <andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com>
>>> To: Mailing List for JSDL-WG <jsdl-wg at ogf.org>
>>> Subject: [jsdl-wg] FINAL CALL on SPMDApplication (was [Fwd: SPMDApplication
>>> 	draft 6 and request for parallel application names])
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have not received any comments on the draft posted last week and there 
>>> are no outstanding issues. As we discussed on the last call I am putting 
>>> this now in final call within the group. The plan is to submit it to the 
>>> OGF Editor for public comment at the end of the week (Friday 16).
>>>
>>> For those who may not be familiar with the process, after submission to 
>>> the OGF Editor this document will enter a public comment period of 
>>> 60-days so you will have plenty of time to comment later on.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> --
>>>   saga-rg mailing list
>>>   saga-rg at ogf.org
>>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/saga-rg