[saga-rg] Re: ISSUE 108

[Andre Merzky]

My opinion: we should define constness in the language
bindings.

Reason:  not all languages support const

Counter-argument:  state constness of objects and parameters
should not vary from one binding to the next.  Well, that
can also be solved by synchronizing the bindings in terms of
constness.

Cheers, Andre.



Quoting [Andre Merzky] (Apr 20 2006):
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:55:33 +0200
> From: Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>
> To: SAGA RG <saga-rg at ggf.org>
> Subject: ISSUE 108
> 
>    108) explain why we don't specify constness.  Or should we?
>         - OPEN, URGENT
>         
> Obvious again.  Opinions?
> 
> Cheers, Andre.
-- 
"So much time, so little to do..."  -- Garfield