[Risge-rg] Summary of the voting for evaluation of standards / next steps

[Michael Schiffers]

Dear all,
according to "The objective of the evaluation is to check what are the 
existing standards in each of the subjects. We would like to see whether 
all the subjects are fully covered by standardisation." I would 
appreciate group anwers to the following question:

Which standards do you consider relevant for the SCHEDULING of instruments?

Thanks and Best, Michael



Marcin Plociennik schrieb:
> 
> Dear All,
> Summary of the voting results:
> 
> - "Accessing instruments in a standard way/unique interface" - 
> coordinated by Roberto Pugliese, Duane Edgington, David Wallom
> - "Data handling – getting data out of the instruments" - coordinated by 
> Franco Davoli, FZK group: Michael Sutter, Rainer Stotzka, David Wallom
> - "Near real time/fast data retrieval and transfer of data / streams" - 
> coordinated by Franco Davoli, FZK group: Michael Sutter, Rainer Stotzka, 
> David Wallom
> - "Service Discovery Information" - coordinated by Marcin Plociennik
> - "Way of monitoring Instruments" - coordinated by Michael Schiffers, 
> Mary Grammatikou, David Wallom
> - "Accounting for instruments instrument health" - coordinated by David 
> Wallom
> - "Scheduling of the instruments" - coordinated by Michael Schiffers
> 
> we had no volunteer for "Calibration (travelling standards)", so we 
> would for the moment skip the subject,
> and maybe come back depending on the evaluation on the rest of subjects.
> 
> I think we should consider first the solution that are/were proposed by 
> the project involved in
> the group. So during the evaluation please consider asking the questions 
> to the whole list .
> 
> Just to remind some of the project contacts:
> http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/listDocuments/projects.risge-rg/docman.root.involved_projects
> 
> I hope we will be able to fininsh the evaluations before holiday time, 
> so before 20th of June.
> 
> There was no remarks to proposed template of the evaluation report, so I 
> think we can start to
> work on it.
> 
> Please consider the RISGE-RG Forge webspace to put draft versions of the 
> documents (one document per subject),
> since the work will be done usually by 3-4 people, so from one hand it 
> will be easier to collaborate, from another hand,
> we could see the progress in each subject.
> For this purpose I have created the directory in our webspace:
> http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/listDocuments/projects.risge-rg/docman.root.standards_evaluation
> 
> 
> best regards
> marcin
> 

-- 
Dr. Michael Schiffers
Munich Network Management Team
Institut für Informatik / Dept. of Informatics
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
http://www.nm.ifi.lmu.de/~schiffer