[Pgi-wg] OGF PGI - Review of notes of OGF30 sessions on 26 October 2010 - Counting votes for requirements

Morris Riedel m.riedel at fz-juelich.de
Thu Nov 11 07:45:45 CST 2010


Dear Balazs,

  would you perhaps join the call today in order to explain more in detail what you mean?

Thanks for your time.

Take care,
Morris 

>-- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>-- Von: pgi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:pgi-wg-bounces at ogf.org] Im Auftrag von Balazs Konya
>-- Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 13:46
>-- An: pgi-wg at ogf.org
>-- Betreff: Re: [Pgi-wg] OGF PGI - Review of notes of OGF30 sessions on 26 October 2010 - Counting votes for
>-- requirements
>-- 
>-- hi Andre, all,
>-- 
>-- On 2010-11-07 19:01, Andre Merzky wrote:
>-- > For PGI, my very humble opinion is that a charter update is not needed
>-- > as long as the group is undecided on the explicit way forward -- and
>-- > that decision is long overdue.
>-- >
>-- > If a group is deadlocked like PGI (or rather if it is running circles
>-- > as PGI seems to do), it is the duty of the chairs to push the group
>-- > along.  In the worst case, if full consensus cannot be reached, a vote
>-- > on the available options can lead to rough consensus, which ought to
>-- > be enough to get things going again.
>-- 
>-- Thanks for this realistic "status report" on PGI.
>-- 
>-- I agree, in order to move the group forward, a push is needed.
>-- 
>-- So, as a first step, the group should understand the "available options". Then,
>-- after sufficient discussion of these options a vote should take place.
>-- 
>-- For the vote, the group should define which group members have a voting right(s).
>-- 
>-- And all this process should be done in a transparent relaxed manner, giving
>-- enough time to people to digest the thing they supposed to vote about. Otherwise
>-- the group will run into similar problems Etienne had just discovered.
>-- 
>-- bye,
>-- Balazs
>-- _______________________________________________
>-- Pgi-wg mailing list
>-- Pgi-wg at ogf.org
>-- http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/pgi-wg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3550 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/pgi-wg/attachments/20101111/06680f78/attachment.bin 


More information about the Pgi-wg mailing list