[Pgi-wg] OGF PGI - Review of notes of OGF30 sessions on 26 October 2010 - Counting votes for requirements

[Morris Riedel]

Hi,

  Interesting thoughts. Indeed.


 >-- Or will we start all the specifications from scratch?

Depends on the rough consensus and majority decisions in the group step by step for each of the specification in question to be
profiled/produces by us.


>-- Maybe this is also something to clarify on Thursday.

Perhaps, but the approach is clear and has been discussed - then with the 'rough consensus' no problem to move forward working on
the specifications.


Take care,
Morris




>-- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>-- Von: pgi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:pgi-wg-bounces at ogf.org] Im Auftrag von Oxana Smirnova
>-- Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. November 2010 17:32
>-- An: pgi-wg at ogf.org
>-- Betreff: Re: [Pgi-wg] OGF PGI - Review of notes of OGF30 sessions on 26 October 2010 - Counting votes for
>-- requirements
>-- 
>-- Hi Morris, all,
>-- 
>-- I came to think about the process: now that we have the use cases and have "derived" the requirements (exact set
>-- of which can be still argued and prioritised in various manners), is it time to come back to the specifications?
>-- The "strawman" and such? The high-level scheme on the photo is in no way different from what we had 2 years ago,
>-- after all (remember, the group was called "BES/JSDL/GLUE" in 2008), the circle is complete now.
>-- 
>-- Or will we start all the specifications from scratch?
>-- 
>-- Maybe this is also something to clarify on Thursday.
>-- 
>-- Cheers,
>-- Oxana
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3550 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/pgi-wg/attachments/20101107/00bbe47e/attachment-0001.bin