[Pgi-wg] EGI use case - Please confirm that its format is acceptable - URGENT

Etienne URBAH urbah at lal.in2p3.fr
Fri Jul 23 11:54:51 CDT 2010


Morris and Johannes,

Concerning PGI Use Cases :

Lot of thanks to Oxana for her 'EGI use case' at 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc16031?nav=1 :

-  In spite of a bad OGSA-based template, she achieved to provide 
relevant, appropriate and useful information, which should serve as 
basis for standardization.
    The good quality of the content permitted me to add suggestions of 
improvement as comments inside the document.
    I also suggest that Steven NEWHOUSE reviews this document.

-  Morris and Johannes, can you please urgently confirm that you accept 
the format of this 'EGI use case' ?
    This would permit me to :
    - put aside for a moment my own template proposal,
    - present the EDGI Use Cases using the 'EGI use case' as template.

    Thank you in advance for a quick confirmation.

Best regards.

-----------------------------------------------------
Etienne URBAH         LAL, Univ Paris-Sud, IN2P3/CNRS
                       Bat 200   91898 ORSAY    France
Tel: +33 1 64 46 84 87      Skype: etienne.urbah
Mob: +33 6 22 30 53 27      mailto:urbah at lal.in2p3.fr
-----------------------------------------------------


On 22/07/2010 20:16, Oxana Smirnova wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since there were no other volunteers, I did my best writing up EGI use case:
>
> http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc16031
>
> As I am not affiliated with EGI, I do not claim I got everything right,
> and will appreciate if EGI people can cross-check and correct whatever
> is wrong.
>
> Cheers,
> Oxana

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5073 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/pgi-wg/attachments/20100723/9b6a9358/attachment.bin 


More information about the Pgi-wg mailing list