[Pgi-wg] Voice and Screen Sharing system

[Etienne URBAH]

Johannes and Michaela,

GoToMeeting voice sharing had bad quality, and User interface is poor.

I fully agree with Michaela :  DFN has acceptable sound quality and good 
user interface.

Therefore, I propose to revert to DFN.

Best regards.

-----------------------------------------------------
Etienne URBAH         LAL, Univ Paris-Sud, IN2P3/CNRS
                       Bat 200   91898 ORSAY    France
Tel: +33 1 64 46 84 87      Skype: etienne.urbah
Mob: +33 6 22 30 53 27      mailto:urbah at lal.in2p3.fr
-----------------------------------------------------


On Thu, 15/07/2010 17:32, Johannes Watzl wrote:
> Hi Michaela,
>
> for me the DFN system was also working without problems in different
> operating systems. For me DFN would be fine.
>
> Best,
> Johannes
>
>
>
> Am 15.07.2010 17:17, schrieb Michaela Lechner:
>> Just an add-on to the last point by Etienne:
>> So far I was most satisfied with DFN: I experienced good soundquality
>> without any noticeable breaks, I could read the chat and watch the
>> screenshare all at the same time without having to install anything, it
>> is OS independent. The list of all users seemed complete. Now I even
>> bought an office microphone...
>>
>> I don't quite understand why it was classified as moderate by Morris. To
>> me at least it looked like a rather good solution.
>> I'll be on vacation next week so I unfortunately won't be able to join
>> the next meeting to test another fancy telco system. ;-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michaela

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5073 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/pgi-wg/attachments/20100715/477b7698/attachment.bin