[Pgi-wg] requirement document

[Balazs Konya]

dear David, Steven, others

David Wallom wrote:
was [Pgi-wg] Promised document
> HI Moreno,
> 
> Could we then have effort from Balazs, Morris or yourself to remove the
> "This needs text", "Further info needed" sections etc. Personally I prefer
> the extremely concise list within Andrews document. If we don't like that
> can we strip the Strawman (which it is not a requirements document) of
> extraneous text and get back to an explicit list of the requirements for
> specific components.
> 
> David 

Steven wrote:
> So what about Andrew's document? He has gone through and enumerated each
> requirement in a particular area... why would you not use this SHORT
> document to help determine where we have consensus and where we do not?

 > Steven


The group has been discussing the requirement document through quite some 
meetings. By now I consider the requirement document being accepted by the 
group. The document is THIS one:

http://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/doc15590?nav=1

and not any kind of derivatives of it.

The document is still a draft, it needs some further editing. Unfortunately, 
that editing work is pending because of the ever opening new discussion frontiers.

I encourage everyone to send corrections related to the *original* requirement 
document.


cheers,
Balazs
PGI co-chair