[Pgi-wg] Promised document

[David Wallom]

HI Moreno,

Could we then have effort from Balazs, Morris or yourself to remove the
"This needs text", "Further info needed" sections etc. Personally I prefer
the extremely concise list within Andrews document. If we don't like that
can we strip the Strawman (which it is not a requirements document) of
extraneous text and get back to an explicit list of the requirements for
specific components.

David 


On 15/05/2009 11:20, "Moreno Marzolla" <moreno.marzolla at pd.infn.it> wrote:

> David Wallom wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> Can we first agree (on the list, possibly with a doodle vote) that the
>> requirements described in Andrews document were accurate. At this first
>> stage please ignore the implementation, just are the requirements correct
>> and if not what changes are required.
> 
> The requirements document is this one:
> 
> http://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/doc15590?nav=1
> 
> (possibly with a better name). I suggest that any modification and
> improvement of the requirements should be done there.
> 
> Moreno.