[Pgi-wg] Sec: Agreement on attribute transport mechanismsforAttrAuthZ

[Aleksandr Konstantinov]

On Friday 20 March 2009 13:14, Morris Riedel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> >- My personal thinking is, since we are talking about PGI or
> interoperability, we probably do need to change the current implementation
> if it can not satisfy interoperability, while keeping the principle that the
> change should be as little as possible. 
> 
>  
> 
> In terms of little changes I agree - but I consider PGI_TLS / PGI_GSI as
> massive changes.
> 
>  
> 
> For instance, we have developed a UNICORE Gateway (for AuthN) that works
> with PGI_TLS naturally - and PGI_GSI more recently providing of course not
> FULL delegation support per hop, but proxies are supported on GSI-TLS level.

I'm lost. What do mean by PGI_GSI technically? Is there any document which
defines it? How is it related to delegation?


A.K.