[ogsa-wg] OGSA WSRF BP Interop

[Michel Drescher]

Hi Rachana,

that's great news, thanks.

Please, by all means do forward the mail to the Globus discussion  
lists as you see fit.

As for the C developers, I do not have an explicit document; I plan to  
obtain the original Word document, and change that one more or less on  
the fly. All I have at the moment are the sketches in my previous mails.

Cheers,
Michel

On 19 May 2008, at 16:08, Rachana Ananthakrishnan wrote:

> Hi Michel,
>
> Thanks for the note, have been on work travel and vacation all of  
> last week.
>
> Both recommendations seem fine to me. On the notification issue, I  
> think
> Globus already expects that the topic will be a QName and complying  
> with the
> profile requirements should be straightforward.
>
> May I forward your previous email on this topic to globus discussion  
> list?
> Is there an explicit document on this that I can forward to Globus
> developers working on C code?
>
> Thanks,
> Rachana
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michel Drescher [mailto:Michel.Drescher at uk.fujitsu.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:39 AM
>> To: Rachana Ananthakrishnan
>> Cc: ogsa-wg at ogf.org
>> Subject: OGSA WSRF BP Interop
>>
>> Hi Rachana,
>>
>> as you were not on today's OGSA phone conference on the OGSA WSRF BP
>> interop effort, we would like to ask your opinion on the following.
>>
>> On the call the group agreed to change the WSRF Profile's resource
>> properties "ResourcePropertyNames" and "WSResourceInterfaces" to the
>> WSRF style of Resource Properties.
>>
>> The group also discussed to proceed with the proposal on the WS-
>> Notification issue, i.e. creating a profile-specific topic
>> dialect as
>> proposed on the Mailing List (respective E-Mail attached).
>>
>> Based on your earlier comments we conjecture that you would not
>> object, but we would like to solicit that before we proceed.
>>
>>
>