[ogsa-wg] container model document for OGSA call Nov 2

[Natale, Bob]

Hi Ellen,
 
The discussion of subclassing in the second paragraph of Sec. 2 is a
little unclear to me.  Toward the beginning it says "there is no need
to define subclasses of the Container class.", but later allows that
[the BES container] "may need to be defined as a subclass of the
Container class to capture all the needed semantics."
 
Did the first statement really mean something like "there is no need to
pre-define subclasses..." or "there is no need to define
subclasses...at this time"?
 
[Apologies if this next part is way off base...some time has passed
since I wrote the above and I don't have your document at hand at this
time.]
 
It seemed to me that the MOF text was not in total agreement with the
UML...esp. wrt some of the method return values...?
 
Cheers,
BobN


________________________________

	From: ogsa-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:ogsa-wg-bounces at ogf.org]
On Behalf Of Ellen Stokes
	Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:52 PM
	To: ogsa-wg at ogf.org
	Subject: [ogsa-wg] container model document for OGSA call Nov 2
	
	

	Folks, 
	
	Here's the container model document for the OGSA call Nov 2. 
	https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc13994?nav=1 
	
	I suspect most of you won't have time to read it prior to the
call, so I'll provide a general overview at the Nov 2 call. 
	
	The XML section still needs to be written (plan to have for
OGSA F2F Nov 9-10). 
	
	Ellen 
	

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogsa-wg/attachments/20061102/05419eb0/attachment.html