[ogsa-wg] Paper proposing "evolutionary vertical design efforts"

Hiro Kishimoto hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com
Mon Feb 20 23:30:31 CST 2006


Savas' email bounced.
-- 
Hiro Kishimoto

Subject: RE: [ogsa-wg] Paper proposing "evolutionary vertical design 
efforts"
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:52:03 -0800
From: "Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis at microsoft.com>

I am not familiar with GFD-I.59. From your description, is it right to
assume that even the WS-RF-based profile is going to be informational
given that WS-RF and related specs were not standards at the time the
work on the profile started?

--
Savas Parastatidis
http://savas.parastatidis.name


 >> -----Original Message-----
 >> From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com]
 >> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 6:11 PM
 >> To: Maguire_Tom at emc.com
 >> Cc: Marvin Theimer; ogsa-wg at ggf.org; Savas Parastatidis; Tony Hey;
 >> humphrey at cs.virginia.edu; gcf at grids.ucs.indiana.edu
 >> Subject: Re: [ogsa-wg] Paper proposing "evolutionary vertical design
 >> efforts"
 >>
 >> Hi Tom,
 >>
 >> You are absolutely right. If the upcoming HPC profile refers to non-
 >> standard spec(s), it should be categorized as "informational."
 >> ----
 >> Hiro Kishimoto
 >>
 >> Maguire_Tom at emc.com wrote:
 >
 >>> > I appreciate and agree with the perspective that suggests that OGSA
 >>> > functionality be profiled using existing agreed upon specifications.
 >>> > Are you suggesting WS-Security, WS-Trust, WS-SecureConversation, and
 >>> > WS-ReliableMessaging as those common, agreed upon, non-controversial
 >>> > specifications?  Some of these are at Standard (WS-Security), some

are

 >>> > at committee draft (WS-ReliableMessaging) and some of them are at
 >>> > editor drafts (WS-Trust, WS-SecureConversation).  The GGF guidelines
 >>> > for OGSA Profile Definition (GFD-I.59) would require that a profile
 >>> > based on these specifications be classified as an Informational
 >>> > Profile (given the current state of the specifications).  Further I
 >>> > would like to point out that the normative thorn in the side here
 >
 >> continues to be WS-Policy.
 >
 >>> >
 >>> >
 >>> > Thanks,
 >>> > Tom
 >>> >
 >>> > Mobile: +1-845-729-4806

 >>> >
 >>> >
 >>> >
 >>> >
 >
 >>=20





More information about the ogsa-wg mailing list