Proposal of OGSA panel "Working with OGSA" (Re: [ogsa-wg] Teleconference minutes - 8 February 2006)
Hiro Kishimoto
hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com
Thu Feb 9 04:39:40 CST 2006
Hi all,
> ** Panel discussion
> - Reviewed Andreas' draft panel description, proposed balance and
> identified candidates for participants and moderator.
> - One proposal is to have two moderators, one from industry the
> other from academia. It is interesting but there was some
> uncertainty on how well the format would work.
> - Candidates so far are mostly from academia. Looking for more
> commercial/industry representatives. Possible candidates:
> - Tony Hey (MS)
> - Franco Travostino (Nortel)
> - David Martin (IBM)
> - /Someone from Univa/
> Action: Hiro will post the panel proposal text to the list and
> followup with the identified candidates to confirm the final
> selection.
The following is what we've agreed Today.
"OGSA is the flagship architecture of GGF and one of its most active
WGs. It has published a number of documents and more are in the
pipeline. A number of fellow WGs are also busy refining parts of the
architecture. But perhaps in some ways the group, its activities, and
aims are a black box to many people in GGF. To bridge this communication
gap this panel will explore the experiences of people working with OGSA;
the expectations of people wishing to work with OGSA; as well as attempt
to shed more light on the group's activities and objectives."
Panelist candidates (5 at most?):
JSDL (Steve McGough/Ali Anjomshoaa)
OMII/BES (Steven Newhouse)
EGEE (Francesco Prelz?)
Tony Hey (Microsoft)
Franco (Nortel)
UNIVA (?)
John Tollefsrud (SUN)
An active OGSA member (perhaps Andrew Grimshaw, Jay, Hiro, ...)
- Panel balance. Should include people from
- Europe, US, Asia-Pacific
- Industry, Academia
- Big Grid project (with deployments) and
Commercial vendors or adopters
- Other GGF WGs
- An active OGSA member
- (option) Other standards bodies?
Moderator candidates:
#1 Malcolm Atkinson
#2 John Tollefsrud
#3 Dave Martin
Thanks,
----
Hiro Kishimoto
Andreas Savva wrote:
> Minutes attached.
>
> https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/minutes-20060208/en/1
>
> Have a good trip and see you at GGF16.
> --
> Andreas Savva
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> OSGA Teleconference minutes - 8 February 2006
> =============================================
>
> * Participants
>
> Hiro Kishimoto (Fujitsu)
> Fred Maciel (Hitachi)
> Mark Morgan (UVa)
> Takuya Mori (NEC)
> Andreas Savva (Fujitsu)
> Ellen Stokes (IBM)
> Ravi Subramaniam (Intel)
> Jem Treadwell (HP)
>
> Minutes: Andreas Savva
>
> * Summary of Actions
>
> Action: Hiro to upload the Profiles to the GGF Editor tracker
>
> Action: Hiro will post the panel proposal text to the list and
> followup with the identified candidates to confirm the final
> selection.
>
>
> * February 6 minutes approved with no changes
>
> * Monday teleconference information (dial-in numbers) will change
> after GGF16.
>
> - Many thanks to HP (Jeffrin) for providing the facilities so far.
>
> * Basic security profiles update
>
> - Final call finished last Monday
> - Some minor revisions from Hiro and Jem
> - Agreed that the profiles can be submitted to the GGF Editor
>
> Action: Hiro to upload the Profiles to the GGF Editor tracker
>
> * WSRF Basic Profile update - no update
>
> * RSM license - Ellen is following up.
>
> * Glossary
>
> - Data Federation: Accepted 'logical' and added "In OGSA," since this
> is an OGSA specific definition.
>
> - Re-worked definitions for "use case" and "scenarios" merging the
> two proposals.
>
> Jem will upload the document but will not issue a final call. There
> will be a combined OGSA 1.5 final call (Architecture and Glossary)
> when Andreas uploads the final version late this week, early next
> week.
>
> * Wikipedia - OGSA entry
>
> - Jem has updated the entry (OGSA). The motivation is just to make
> sure that the correct information is provided in that public
> forum. More detailed information will be maintained on the GGF
> site.
>
> * GGF16 planning
>
> ** Panel discussion
>
> - Reviewed Andreas' draft panel description, proposed balance and
> identified candidates for participants and moderator.
>
> - One proposal is to have two moderators, one from industry the
> other from academia. It is interesting but there was some
> uncertainty on how well the format would work.
>
> - Candidates so far are mostly from academia. Looking for more
> commercial/industry representatives. Possible candidates:
> - Tony Hey (MS)
> - Franco Travostino (Nortel)
> - David Martin (IBM)
> - /Someone from Univa/
>
> Action: Hiro will post the panel proposal text to the list and
> followup with the identified candidates to confirm the final
> selection.
>
> ** Information model session agenda
>
> The session will be a working session focusing on the Modeling
> guidelines (Fred) and the container documents (Ellen)
>
> Proposed and accepted that it should be a bottom-up session,
> starting with the BES container to motivate the more general
> guidelines discussion---make it clear that the 'guidelines' is
> based off the process that came up with the container.
>
> It should be made very clear that the guidelines are formulated
> based on work actually done and are not a blue-sky description of
> an untried process.
>
> Expected audience for this session: EMS (mainly) and possibly Data
>
> - BES was initially chosen as a candidate since it is a simple(r)
> component in EMS. Along the same lines of thoughts a likely first
> candidate in data is the BYTEIO-WG---it deals with files.
>
> - It should also be emphasized that the RM design team is not trying
> to make more work for other WGs. The main work will be done in
> OGSA; but domain expert collaboration is needed.
>
> - A grid view of storage is another candidate (ref. SNIA)
>
> * Modeling Guidelines document review
>
> There was not sufficient time to review the document in detail. Some
> comments were to add
> - information on how to get access to tools (RSM license);
> - that the process has been used to come up with the BES container
> model (and is not a blue-sky approach); and
> - in the introduction that basing the work on CIM is a *proposal*
> (it is mentioned in the Status section but some people might not
> look at that section).
>
> ** F2F agenda review
>
> - Hiro is working to fill in logistical info (location and how to
> get there)
> - Agreed to put 'Next F2F' discussion earlier in the agenda.
> Sometime in the morning is better to make sure that most
> interested parties are present.
More information about the ogsa-wg
mailing list