[ogsa-wg] Teleconference minutes - 14 August 2006

[Andreas Savva]

I won't be able to make the Roadmap call so let me say that I agree with
not moving sections about already published documents to the appendix.

I liked the idea mentioned in the last call of including information
about such documents within the entry of the in-progress version, if
any. Otherwise the entry of a published document could be left as-is in
the Roadmap, or if obsolete deleted.

An alternative is to produce a summary table for each major section
(Information/Recommendation/Profile etc) with information about already
published documents.

Andreas

Christopher Jordan wrote:
> 
> One correction regarding yesterday's discussion - I reviewed the minutes
> from the last Roadmap call, (I didn't take the minutes for that call so
> it slipped my mind more easily) and I was completely incorrect regarding
> the placement of the WSRF Profile document in the appendix. Hiro's
> request was, apparently, that we place published documents in the appendix.
> 
> I think there's some question/complexity regarding the criteria by which
> we place documents referenced in the roadmap into the appendix, so I'm
> going to bring this up for further discussion in tomorrow's Roadmap
> call. Anyone with comments or suggestions regarding the placement of
> published documents should either send them to me via e-mail, or of
> course feel free to join the call tomorrow. For me, I guess, the crucial
> questions are what constitutes a "published document" - something that
> we don't intend to produce a second version of? And if we're going to
> take this route, do we then need to completely replicate the structure
> of the document WRT normative vs informational documents and profiles?
> And if so, at what point does the appendix become so unwieldy that it
> should really just be part of the main document? Just some thoughts off
> the top of my head.
> 
> Details regarding tomorrow's call will follow shortly.


-- 
Andreas Savva
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd