[ogsa-wg] Profile definition v13
Tom Maguire
tmaguire at us.ibm.com
Thu Jun 23 11:18:46 CDT 2005
It is unclear to me after reading through the threads what is the license
issue.
Tom
Frey’s Law: “Every 5 years the number of architecture components double and
the ability to comprehend them halves”
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
there is nothing left to take away. – Antoine de Saint-Exupery
T o m M a g u i r e
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Steve Loughran
<steve_loughran at h
pl.hp.com> To
Sent by: ogsa-wg <ogsa-wg at gridforum.org>
owner-ogsa-wg at ggf cc
.org davanum at gmail.com
Subject
Re: [ogsa-wg] Profile definition
06/23/2005 08:23 v13
AM
Andreas Savva wrote:
> I've uploaded v13 of the Profile definition. This includes a lot of
> edits from Jem and from the review done in the last (yesterday) call.
>
>
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa-profile-definition/en/13
>
>
One little troublespot with the profile is that unless IBM and Microsoft
are willing to adapt their IPR licensing policy for WSSecurity, there
may shortly not be any functional open source WS-Security implementations
the summary of the current state is:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-general&m=111894292828449&w=2
and the licenses in question are
http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/standards/
http://www.ibm.com/ibm/licensing/977Q/2112.shtml
Unless these two vendors come to an amenable position, there isn't going
to be an apache implementation (and that includes an end to WSS4J),
which is going to prevent it from entering the 'community' section, or
being broadly used.
Now, who was planning on using WSS4J in their products?
-steve
More information about the ogsa-wg
mailing list