[ogsa-wg] OGSA Naming WG status report

[Hiro Kishimoto]

Hi Ian,

 > The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences
 > into a separate specification, which I think is important.

The following text intents to mention that separation.

 > In order to satisfy the need to define a resolution port-type as soon
 > as possible, the WG may separate WS-naming specification into two
 > specs; ‘WS-Name resolution and the definition of the abstract name.
 > This discussion and decision will be one of the first work items for
 > the group
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Ian Foster wrote:
> The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences 
> into a separate specification, which I think is important.
> 
> 
> At 03:04 PM 6/16/2005 +0900, Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> GFSG is now deliberating on WG approval. Attached is the
>> final charter draft submitted by Andrew.
>>
>> https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/naming-wg-charter/en/1 
>>
>>
>> Stay tuned.
>> ----
>> Hiro Kishimoto
>>
>> Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
>>
>>> Status report:
>>> Progress on both the charter and WSNR (WS Naming resolution).
>>>     RNS moved back to GFS until through document publication, i.e.,
>>> after public comment
>>>     Resolution modification to support base profile use case done and
>>> discussed
>>>     Open issue remains "names" - which are just a string.
>>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________________________
> Ian Foster                    www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster
> Math & Computer Science Div.  Dept of Computer Science
> Argonne National Laboratory   The University of Chicago
> Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A.     Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A.
> Tel: 630 252 4619             Fax: 630 252 1997
>         Globus Alliance, www.globus.org
>