[ogsa-wg] FINAL CALL Document OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 v036

Tom Maguire tmaguire at us.ibm.com
Fri Jul 29 11:20:55 CDT 2005


owner-ogsa-wg at ggf.org wrote on 07/29/2005 11:01:55 AM:

> Hi
> Just some fairly minor comments, othewise yea, go for it.
> I'll leave it up to Tom to decide on the 3 points below.
>
> Abdeslem
> ====================================================================
> Section 2:
> line 184: should the conformance claim URI be "http://www.ggf.
> org/namespaces/2005/07/OGSAWSRFBasicProfile-1.0"
> and, I guess if we include WSRF here, all other namespaces (in
> schema) should also be changed.

I would prefer to leave it as it is.

> Section 4:
> line 267: DO you mean wsdl:Service or wsdl:Service/port? in WSDL 1.1
> a Service can aggregate many ports.
> Anyway the sentence is not clear: "a list of all portTypes that were
> used to compose the wsdl:Service"? Do you mean
> the portTypes corresponding to different ports, or the list of known
> portTypes that were composed together to make a new portType for
> this Service/port?

changed text to be:

Each instance of a WS-Resource is recommended to provide the ability to
retrieve, through the GetResourceProperty or GetMultipleResourceProperties
message exchange pattern, a list of all known portTypes that were composed
together to make a new portType for the wsdl:Service/port.  Each portType
must be referenced by a QName, where the namespace of the QName is that of
the parent wsdl:definition, (See Appendix C).


> Section 4.4.1:
> line 366: RECOMMENDS should be MANDATES in order to be consistent
> with section 6.1 where the profile MANDATES the use
> NotificationProducer for notifications of events from resources.

My read of that section is that 4.4.1 recommends
ResourcePropertyValueChange
notifications for services that support NotificationProducer (which by
section 6.1 would be all).  I think that mandating support for RPVC
notifications
is different from mandating support for subscribe and notify in general.

> ====================================================================
>
>
>
> Tom Maguire wrote:
> > https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-
> ogsa-wsrf-basic-profile/en/31
> >
> >
> > The final call document for the OGSA WSRF Basic Profile 1.0 is
available
> > for download at the above link.  Please
> > review and positive acknowledge with an email to the mailing list with
your
> > vote (yea or nay) for submission from
> > the workgroup to the GGF Editor.  Please vote (email) by Friday, July
29th
> > COB (EDT).
> >
> > If your vote is 'nay' please include precise comments so that we may
> > address any substantive issues you may have
> > prior to submission.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > Frey’s Law: “Every 5 years the number of architecture components double
and
> > the ability to comprehend them halves”
> >
> >
> > Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
> > there is nothing left to take away.   – Antoine de Saint-Exupery
> >
> >
> > T o m   M a g u i r e
> >
> >
> > STSM, On Demand Architecture
> >
> >
> > Poughkeepsie, NY  12601
> >
> >


More information about the ogsa-wg mailing list