[ogsa-hpcp-wg] latest version of the experiences document

Vesso Novov vesso at doc.ic.ac.uk
Thu Dec 13 12:29:14 CST 2007



Vesso Novov wrote:
> Glenn,
> Just a couple of  comments:
>
> 1. Section "2 Implementation"
> - the GridSAM URL in the table 
> "http://gridsam.sourceforge.net/2.0.1/index.html"
> will always point to version "2.0.1". With this - 
> "http://gridsam.sourceforge.net/" the users are automatically
> re-directed to the latest version.
>
> 2. Section "4 Issues Encountered"
> -  I split  the  GridSAM  issues in two sub-sections; "HPCBP 
> Client->GridSAM Service" and "GridSAM Client->HPCBP Service".
> In the document is not clear where the "GridSAM Client->HPCBP Service" 
> section ends and the Nordugrid issues start - page 8.
> I'm suggesting either separating the entire section 4 into 
> project-specific subsections or clarifying in each "Issue" text whose 
> client/service it refers to.
> (assuming, we want to document 'Who' had issues with 'What' and not 
> just 'What' issues there were).
>
> --Vesso
>
>
> Glenn Wasson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>     Attached is the latest version of the experiences document - thanks
>> to everyone who contributed text! Please have a look and send me 
>> comments.
>> I have not included the various paragraphs about the projects because I
>> wanted to keep this document focused on the interop scenarios, but I 
>> have
>> now included project URLs so that interested parties have a place to 
>> go to
>> find out more. Please make sure that the URLs in there are the ones you
>> would like.
>> Also, I have added 2 matrices to the results section, one for
>> username/password and one for X.509. Currently, they both are copies 
>> of the
>> matrix from the SC07 wiki. What I'd like everyone to do is to verify 
>> that
>> these matrices do, in fact, represent the current state of your 
>> interop. In
>> other words, I know some people only did X.509 authentication and so the
>> username/password matrix is probably wrong for those projects. This 
>> isn't a
>> bad thing (since compliance doesn't require you to implement
>> username/password), I just want to make sure I understand the current 
>> state
>> of things. Also, I know that some projects had problems with particular
>> other projects on particular methods and I want to make sure that the
>> document captures the final state of those issues.
>>
>> Hopefully we can straighten all this out on the call tomorrow.
>>
>> Glenn   
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> -- 
>>   ogsa-hpcp-wg mailing list
>>   ogsa-hpcp-wg at ogf.org
>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-hpcp-wg
>


More information about the ogsa-hpcp-wg mailing list