[ogsa-hpcp-wg] Another Problem (maybe?) in the WSDL
Christopher Smith
csmith at platform.com
Fri Oct 20 15:01:45 CDT 2006
I would vote to changing the problem two to be the same as
GetActivityStatusesType.
-- Chris
On 20/10/06 12:56, "Mark Morgan" <mmm2a at cs.virginia.edu> wrote:
> I believe that the minOccurs is fine. Notice that the real issue is that
> the first one does not use an xml reference, while the two problem elements
> do. In addition to giving the two problem elements a name, I additionally
> vote that we change the first one to match the latter two, or vice-versa.
>
> -Mark
>
> --
> Mark Morgan
> Research Scientist
> Department of Computer Science
> University of Virginia
> http://www.cs.virginia.edu
> mmm2a at virginia.edu
> (434) 982-2047
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christopher Smith [mailto:csmith at platform.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 3:50 PM
>> To: Mark Morgan; ogsa-hpcp-wg at ggf.org
>> Subject: Re: [ogsa-hpcp-wg] Another Problem (maybe?) in the WSDL
>>
>> My tooling seems to cope with this fine, generating the same
>> code in all three cases. Odd.
>>
>> I have no problem with making all three complexTypes look the
>> same in terms of how they are defined (makes me wonder if we
>> should get rid of the minOccurs="0" for
>> GetActivityDocumentsType and TerminateActivitiesType as well).
>>
>> Just curious ... what happens if you get rid of the minOccurs
>> in the two problem types?
>>
>> -- Chris
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20/10/06 12:38, "Mark Morgan" <mmm2a at cs.virginia.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> In trying to interop with Glenn's endpoint, I have found another
>>> potential problem with the BES-Factory's WSDL. However,
>> the problem
>>> is at a level of WSDL that is slightly beyond my experience. In
>>> particular, the problem is with two message types; the
>>> GetActivityDocuments message type, and the TerminateActivitiesType
>>> message. Both problems are identical. In brief, here are three
>>> elements from the WSDL (the first of which is an example of a type
>>> declaration which works for me, and the latter two being
>> the problem declarations).
>>>
>>> <xsd:complexType name="GetActivityStatusesType">
>>> <xsd:sequence>
>>> <xsd:element name="ActivityIdentifier"
>>> type="wsa:EndpointReferenceType"
>>> maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>> </xsd:sequence>
>>> </xsd:complexType>
>>>
>>> <xsd:complexType name="GetActivityDocumentsType">
>>> <xsd:sequence>
>>> <xsd:element ref="bes-factory:ActivityIdentifier"
>>> minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>> </xsd:sequence>
>>> </xsd:complexType>
>>>
>>> <xsd:complexType name="TerminateActivitiesType">
>>> <xsd:sequence>
>>> <xsd:element ref="bes-factory:ActivityIdentifier"
>>> minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>> </xsd:sequence>
>>> </xsd:complexType>
>>>
>>> The first one works for me, and the last two do not. The
>> problem with
>>> the second and third ones is that my tooling doesn't know
>> what name to
>>> give the element for the EPRs inside of the message elements.. In
>>> otherwords, it generates messages which look like the following:
>>>
>>> <GetActivityDocuments
>>> xmlns="http://schemas.ggf.org/bes/2006/08/bes-factory">
>>> <item xmlns=""
>>> xmlns:ns3="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
>>> xsi:type="ns3:EndpointReferenceType">
>>>
>>>
>> <ns3:Address>https://wincluster1.cs.virginia.edu/HPCP/HPCPServ
>> ice.asmx</ns3:
>>> Address>
>>> <ns3:ReferenceParameters>
>>> <jobID
>>> xmlns="http://schemas.ggf.org/hpcp/2006/07/hpcp-app">113</jobID>
>>> </ns3:ReferenceParameters>
>>> </item>
>>> </GetActivityDocuments>
>>>
>>> <TerminateActivities
>>> xmlns="http://schemas.ggf.org/bes/2006/08/bes-factory">
>>> <item xmlns=""
>>> xmlns:ns3="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
>>> xsi:type="ns3:EndpointReferenceType">
>>>
>>>
>> <ns3:Address>https://wincluster1.cs.virginia.edu/HPCP/HPCPServ
>> ice.asmx</ns3:
>>> Address>
>>> <ns3:ReferenceParameters>
>>> <jobID
>>> xmlns="http://schemas.ggf.org/hpcp/2006/07/hpcp-app">113</jobID>
>>> </ns3:ReferenceParameters>
>>> </item>
>>> </TerminateActivities>
>>>
>>> Notice the child element called "item" in each message.
>>>
>>> The simple (and obvious to me) fix was to change the
>>> GetActivityDocuemntsType and TerminateActivitiesType type
>> definitions
>>> to specify the name of the inner element, i.e. to change them to:
>>>
>>> <xsd:complexType name="GetActivityDocumentsType">
>>> <xsd:sequence>
>>> <xsd:element name="ActivityIdentifier"
>>> ref="bes-factory:ActivityIdentifier"
>>> minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>> </xsd:sequence>
>>> </xsd:complexType>
>>>
>>> <xsd:complexType name="TerminateActivitiesType">
>>> <xsd:sequence>
>>> <xsd:element name="ActivityIdentifier"
>>> ref="bes-factory:ActivityIdentifier"
>>> minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>> </xsd:sequence>
>>> </xsd:complexType>
>>>
>>> I know that these are legitimate fixs, the questions are,
>> A) are these
>>> in fact real errors that my tooling is finding and thus the
>> WSDL is in
>>> error, and B) can we make these changes permanent in the
>> BES-Factory
>>> WSDL to fix these problem?
>>>
>>> -Mark
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark Morgan
>>> Research Scientist
>>> Department of Computer Science
>>> University of Virginia
>>> http://www.cs.virginia.edu
>>> mmm2a at virginia.edu
>>> (434) 982-2047
>>>
>>> --
>>> ogsa-hpcp-wg mailing list
>>> ogsa-hpcp-wg at ogf.org
>>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-hpcp-wg
>>
>
More information about the ogsa-hpcp-wg
mailing list